PP Mguire
Build Guru
- Messages
- 32,592
- Location
- Fort Worth, Texas
No court statements, and AFIAK MSI has made no comment because their CEO died around the same time this happened. 10 years ago for me may be a decade ago, but this literally happened recently. This month. MSI was caught trying to get a smaller channel to redo their titles and skew their results for a better image of their board. The channel refused and went public. Bigger channels like Jay, Linus, and GN reported on it, TPU, Hot Hardware, Anandtech all reported on it. Was and is still a big deal. I got slammed by fellow reviewers of my own site for not complying because the site itself was going downhill, and it eventually lead to me not reviewing hardware anymore on a professional basis. I quit because I'm not going to purge my integrity and dignity to say something is good when it's not. I joined to make unbiased professional reviews and it was the 3rd time I got pressured to write more positivity for a product. I met that exact PR person at Quakecon of 2010 and the dude was an absolute ass to me simply because I would not inflate their brand. Sure it's one individual conducting PR fraud to spruce a brand name, but their PR department as a whole has been doing this for a long time now. As you mentioned, that was 10 years ago, so it means each new individual dealing with press is being coerced to do this. I cannot stand by that.But bribery accusation is not something to just tell. Were there any court statements? It's possible, or course, and I believe your personal experience. It's just who it was. Any corrupt individual can give a bad name to any firm one way or another. And those individuals are in every single firm somewhere. But in the end they are all business. I only care about specific services that I want, not their name. 10 years ago is far away, anyway. I also had a good Asrock 8 years ago contrary to the questionable Z490 Asrock now. All my builds have mixed brands.
From cars to computers this isn't a good comparison in this regard. When you're dealing with engines vs electronic components there are many many different factors at play vs a set of electronic components designed to a strict guideline and meant to deliver exactly what the paper says. VRMs in this instance have to be precise and in this case it's really clear cut. A 9 phase with a much better cooling solution can deliver more sustained power for a longer period of time without fluctuating than a 10 phase that has little to no cooling. When VRMs and chokes went digital this tolerance became even tighter.Specs on paper do not matter "as much" as actual performance/results, not that they just don't matter. They do matter. I meant there could be some hidden details like something internal. Cool car, BTW. I own an old car myself (W124 1992 300E) and I prefer natural aspirated engines. Ecoboost (for a moment I thought there was something else called evoboost) is an additional tech over the main part. I presume your 90s V8 was naturally aspirated. Ecoboost is meant to increase performance. Other forced induction methods are used to decrease gas consumption. These two points make exceptions.
Don't worry too much about this reply, tho. It's more of trying to clarify what I meant, nothing important related to the discussion. And I wanted to talk about cars.
Anywho, I love talking about cars too. Ecoboost is a fancy Ford name for it's got a tiny turbo lol. I used to have a 2015 Focus that was also an Ecoboost. It was a little 3cyl with a tiny turbo and had like no power. My 90s V8 even if I put a turbo on it still wouldn't make as much as the newer 4cyl. Power levels were severely limited due to smog regulation and Ford 90s engines were just built really poorly for performance. If I spent 6 grand on a Kenne Bell supercharger kit for a direct fit I'd be lucky to make in the ballpark of 300HP. It's why I haven't done jack with it because there's no point dumping money into the turd. I can spend 4 grand on a set of higher flowing heads or 6 grand on some 4v heads. Another 3 grand in pistons, rods, and camshaft, then dump about 500 into fuel delivery and I'm sitting at 350 best case scenario. Right there I'm already spending 5.0 money that puts 400+ to the crank
Yooo I like your old benz. Looks like an old mafia car or Russian politician car.
I didn't take it as rude, I just wanted to make it clear. Your assessment of Steve is exactly what I was talking about. Graphs don't tell the full picture and it's usually all people look at. Is he over technical? Sure, but that's never a bad thing to have all the details and facts at hand. Then again I'm the same way.Just to be safe, I didn't mean to be rude when I said your assessment sounded subjective to me.
It's true that Steve is knowledgeable, but he's being too technical. To me as a consumer, I want someone practical to show me results-numbers. But this is just a neutral comment. GNex does give numbers, and I basically trust them, but it just happened that I didn't cross ways with them.