Harold III
In Runtime
- Messages
- 333
Emily said:Sure I do... it seems like if that were faked, it would get out somehow.
I think there are more than just the pictures. I read some articles talking about:
1. pure oxygen problem. as early as 1965 Nasa realized that using pure oxygen in the landing cabin was not safe, because electrical sparks would cause severe fire. but in 1967 they still did an experiment, about using pure oxygen in the landing cabin; the experiment objects were 3 REAL ASTRONAUTS. They KNEW it was dangerous why they still use real astronauts? They ended up all dead because of the fire. some People thought they were actually intentionally killed because they didn't want to cooperate with the fake project.
2. Moon temperature and the film. The temperature of moon in daytime is as high as 250 F, how could they make video shot with the film which shrinks at 150F? apparently the camera didn't have any protection as we see in the video shot.
3. Saturn 5's power was larger than any current rockets. why it was abandoned, and no any design papers left?
4. In the video shot the astronauts only jumped as high as we do on earth. everybody knows that moon's gravity is 1/6 of the earth, those astronauts should jump 6 times higher than we do. Some people played the video 2.5 times faster than that shown by NASA, and everything looked fine just as it was on earth.
5. Landing. everybody knows about Armstrong's first footprint. A regular jet plane's engine can blow stones as big as eggs away, on earth; how about the spaceship's engine, on the moon? if the powerful engine didn't make any effect on the moon surface how could Armstrong easily make an footprint? Or we can consider that where the ship landed had thick layer of sand underneath, so the engine wouldn't blow all them away and Armstrong could make a foot print; but in this case the ship has already sunk into the sand. Therefore they must find a big rock surface to land on; then how comes the foot print?
6. how could the development of the whole project use very short period of time? After the death of three astronauts in that experiment, they had to modify the ship's structure, and those electrical wiring, which took them 18 months. But right after that was the successful landing. It was too fast to be rational.
I got all these from the internet, they seem to be pretty strong arguments.