Basicly the way I understand the law is like this
If you have proof of ownership of a 'whatever', then you are allowed to copy, burn, download, and even place a 'whatever' in a area of your harddrive that others might have access to(filesharing, ftp, ect.). If you have no proof of ownership, then you have no right to have anything to do with a 'whatever'. Generally they do try to take down distributors as they often are the biggest offenders, but its also the whole make it harder thing.
The whole thing started with a case with a guy whos last name was Warez. A judge set him free based on those grounds, because he owned legal copys of the things he was distributing. So basicly it became alot harder to get a search warrent for what they think you may not have proof of ownership for.
I'm not really sure of the legality issues of the RIAA, only that they were suppose to be targeting people that were downloading 100's of songs a day. Those charges would probably be droped if you came up with proof that you actually owned all those cd's, or had proof of ownership. Anyway, if you want 0 risk then don't download illegal stuff, if you want low risk then download only what your actually going to use or listen to. As the saying goes no risk, no reward.
If you have proof of ownership of a 'whatever', then you are allowed to copy, burn, download, and even place a 'whatever' in a area of your harddrive that others might have access to(filesharing, ftp, ect.). If you have no proof of ownership, then you have no right to have anything to do with a 'whatever'. Generally they do try to take down distributors as they often are the biggest offenders, but its also the whole make it harder thing.
The whole thing started with a case with a guy whos last name was Warez. A judge set him free based on those grounds, because he owned legal copys of the things he was distributing. So basicly it became alot harder to get a search warrent for what they think you may not have proof of ownership for.
I'm not really sure of the legality issues of the RIAA, only that they were suppose to be targeting people that were downloading 100's of songs a day. Those charges would probably be droped if you came up with proof that you actually owned all those cd's, or had proof of ownership. Anyway, if you want 0 risk then don't download illegal stuff, if you want low risk then download only what your actually going to use or listen to. As the saying goes no risk, no reward.