********. Bulldozer was and will always be slower than Phenom 2 which is why it was called Faildozer. They aren't even anywhere close to SB in performance, so if I was you I wouldn't try bringing the 2nd (forget 3rd or 4th) gen Intel's in here.
I get it, you like your FX, and you're happy with it, but don't come into a thread spewing complete nonsense. In almost (99%) every single benchmark the 1100t creams the 6100 and sometimes even the 8150/20 at stock. The only place Bulldozer gets Phenom 2 is in memory bandwidth due to the Phenom 2 having a weaker IMC and a memory standard of 1333.
The question being asked was why do Bulldozer (specifically 6100) get bad reviews. Because they are bad, poor performing chips that were hot and power hungry. Simple. As. That.
People like them because they do well for their needs, that's fine. Thing is, it doesn't change raw benchmark numbers across the line and it isn't like it really varies between sites either. Not much really to argue there because numbers don't lie.