CalcProgrammer1
Fully Optimized
- Messages
- 2,363
- Location
- Illinois, USA
I agree that Windows 7 is coming along well, but I have to question the tests. They say that Windows XP is the slowest to boot? I call nonsense! I've ran Windows 7 6801 and XP Home on two different computers as well (Pentium 3 850MHz/512MB RAM and Sempron 1.85GHz/2GB RAM) and have to say, XP boots fast. Also, saying Vista boots faster than XP is definitely a lie, one of Vista's largest complaints is that it is bloated and hogs resources. This definitely results in a slower boot. If anything, I'd say XP fastest, 7 second, Vista slowest, but not the other way around!
I think the requirements for 7 will be lower than Vista. At worst they'll be the same. Microsoft is trying to make Windows 7 lighter than Vista and use less system resources. So far it seems they are succeeding.
I think the requirements for 7 will be lower than Vista. At worst they'll be the same. Microsoft is trying to make Windows 7 lighter than Vista and use less system resources. So far it seems they are succeeding.