Codeine said:I dont understand how people can bash CRT... First LCD max resolution is 1200/1200. Most LCD's have 1200/700, while most CRT have 1600/1200+. Personally i cant stand when people bash CRT, becasue they are soo much better then LCD.
If your watchong LCD from a angle, then the monitors coloring starts to get all shady. Plus CRT has alot more depth. All the shadows and glears in video games just look so much better. Again even better with that 2000/1600 resolution. While they have better quality, they still cost less. I mean why even go LCD, is size really that important? I mean what would you guys rather do. Spend 800$ on a 19inch LCD with 1200/1200 resolution, or spend 800$ on a 22inch CRT with 2000/2500 resolution?? Its pretty obvious witch is the better choice.
but i would NOT want to lug around a 22" CRT monitor...i might get a hernia lmao. some people need LCD's for that reason alone...and i mean the LCD isn't "terrible" by any means. it just lacks certain requirements/standards that you personally want. most people i know use 1024*768 max res, 65hz refresh rate lmao...they dont care about anything higher. i like the smaller screen size 100hz on my CRT.
also 1200*1200 is NOT max res for LCD monitors...i don't know what you mean. This one here can do 1600*1200....
http://www.newegg.com/app/viewproductdesc.asp?description=24-116-299&DEPA=1