peterhuang913 Retired. Messages 8,076 Location . May 24, 2007 #11 isnt it an architectural problem that they cant jam a memory controller in?
Apokalipse Golden Master Messages 14,559 Location Melbourne, Australia May 24, 2007 #12 peterhuang913 said: isnt it an architectural problem that they cant jam a memory controller in? Click to expand... I think it's more to do with the fact that it costs time and money.
peterhuang913 said: isnt it an architectural problem that they cant jam a memory controller in? Click to expand... I think it's more to do with the fact that it costs time and money.
O Okitasoshi In Runtime Messages 174 May 25, 2007 #13 Apokalipse said: I think it's more to do with the fact that it costs time and money. Click to expand... Intel has time and money...especially money.
Apokalipse said: I think it's more to do with the fact that it costs time and money. Click to expand... Intel has time and money...especially money.
Apokalipse Golden Master Messages 14,559 Location Melbourne, Australia May 25, 2007 #14 Okitasoshi said: Intel has time and money...especially money. Click to expand... well that's kinda besides the point.
Okitasoshi said: Intel has time and money...especially money. Click to expand... well that's kinda besides the point.