macombaland
In Runtime
- Messages
- 149
i think PC will be the future for everything, and consoles will die soon
They may not die but it looks like theyre trying to become more like PC's everyday.
these threads are lame.
i think PC will be the future for everything, and consoles will die soon
maroon1 said:i think PC will be the future for everything, and consoles will die soon
Flanker said:We CAN be friends. If everyone admits that Consoles own PCs in games, and will continue to own them for a LONG time, and there is no reason to buy a gaming PC over a console at this point. :classic:
becoming like pc in what ????macombaland said:They may not die but it looks like theyre trying to become more like PC's everyday.
these threads are lame.
Haha!! Are you kidding me?? One of the reasons I haven't bought a console since the N64 was because of the f*cking confusing and uncomfortable controllers. The controller on the N64 was perfect, it did everything you needed and had an easy layout. The controllers on the PS2 and Xbox are so retarded with like 3 control sticks, 5 sets of button pads, different color buttons, different letter buttons and different shape buttons!! I might get a PS3 however, seeing as it has support for a keyboard and mouse out of the box, AND it will have a web browser, and I'm sure with a little fiddeling you could get it up and running as a PC with linux.HAVOC2k5 said:The only thing I like about the XBOX is the controllers.
maroon1 said:i think PC will be the future for everything, and consoles will die soon.
HAVOC2k5 said:YOU SEEM TO THINK YOUR OPINION IS THE ONLY RIGHT ONE.
HAVOC2k5 said:Well guess what pal? There is no right or wrong when it comes to opinion. You spend more time trying to fight people against their opinions. YOU'RE WRONG DUDE. Simple as that. You can't argue opinion. (FACT) of course that can be argued.
HAVOC2k5 said:Flanker you are quickly becoming the most unlikable member of TF. Hands down, your posts are the most obnoxious and arrogant.
HAVOC2k5 said:You spend more time QUOTING others post and trying to prove them wrong and how you are right. It's just plain stupid...
HAVOC2k5 said:You should consider going to law school and becoming a lawyer dude. Because it seems like to you every thread is a trail. And you're always trying to win. Which you will never do.
HAVOC2k5 said:Just give it a rest dude. You're annoying like a freakin' mosquito buzzing around your head. You just wanna smash it and get it to STFU.
HAVOC2k5 said:See flanker, "This is an opinion." He's not right or wrong. It's just his opinion. Which he has every right to.
Oh yea, he has a right to it. And through Freedom of Speech, I also have a right to see if I can change his opinion and rid the world of another PC-fanboy.
This is were you will quote him and say something like this:
"What are you crazy?" That's the dumbest thing i've ever seen. You're a noob. PC's are the future. Oh my god... They aren't the future. "What ever I say is the future is the future." And if you disagree with me you're just stupid and dumb and don't know what your talking about."
Well, I guess you were wrong then.
So basically you'll be nice and civil if everyone agrees with your opinion and beliefs? That's what that statement says.
Vybuni said:All that happens is that flanker takes everyones opinions and says that they are shit and that he is the only right one.
well true gigaflops alone dont equal a good system but combined with a powerful graphics and physics card they do.Vybuni said:more gigaflops dont always = better system.
Vybuni said:You dont prove anything. All you say is that PS3 has like 220gigaflops of power or whatever. Big deal. more gigaflops dont always = better system.
You are the big fanboy.
killians45 said:As of now, the architecture is VERY effecient (in instructional execution, that is not in the time it takes to program) and like stated by others, has an incredible future when the hardware is taken full advantage of. Also, as far as it taking a long time to program, most companies are employing more programmers on a single project, thus the increase in game prices. Now, onto how long it will take for the PC to catch up. You MUST understand the architecture of this system to fully appreciate it, that includes how the cache system works in conjunction with the GPU (amazing bit of engineering), environemental synthesis, thread handling, unified shading, etc. For a PC to do this, you are looking at MANY changes having to be made. A MBD to support this architecture, the machine level instructions able to support many different developers of graphics cards, think about the problems that will arise making not just one system with such a specialized MBD, but being able to make MANY various card manufacturers communicate. The new architecture and low level languages make this a daunting task. So, not only the technological level is causing a road block for this, but the many different types of developers and making the os stable enough to handle it. Not to mention, will the major public do a complete overhaul of not just a processor, but new everything that will not be as user friendly to swap parts for as its predecessor?
killians45 said:Now, PC compared to them? No contest, the next generation consoles will dominate. Eventually, as always happens, the PC market will catch up and surpass the console market. However, with this current console generation I wouldn't look at it happening as quickly as it usually does and eventually the console life span will eventually equal that of the PC where its hardware will infact be good for 5 years.