Martin
Daemon Poster
- Messages
- 1,422
- Location
- California
dawizhacker said:Here's another one:
Which decays faster: an Isotope with a short or with a long Half-Life?
I would right away say short because of logic, but it seems to easy to be that, which one is it?
Short.
This can be modeled with a simple differential equation:
(dE/dt) = (k*E), which after integration through separation of variables yields E(t) = E(0)*exp^(k*t) where E(t) is the mass of the isotope present at any given time (I chose E since I use (I) to represent current in a circuit, which can cause confusion). k is used to represent the rate at which the isotope decays, and in this case it would be negative. (exp = e = ~2.71828.... etc., t = time in years)
Let's model this carefully: (Let's assume one isotope has a half-life of 250 years and another has an HL of 500 years), and that you start off with 100 g of that isotope:
50 = 100 exp^(k*250)
50 = 100 exp^(k*500)
Solve for k on both equations. k ends up being -ln(2) / 250 and -ln(2)/500 respectively, or -0.002773 and -0.001386 respectively. The latter has a slower decay rate, and corresponds to a longer half-life, thus the former has a faster decay rate and a shorter half-life.
Hope this in-depth proof was helpful.