OP OP rave_tech In Runtime Messages 162 Location somwhere out there..... Dec 7, 2008 #11 so 2 x 9600 GSO is faster than 1 8800GT?
philbar71 Fully Optimized Messages 4,533 Location Suffolk, VA Dec 7, 2008 #12 um, yes 2 9600gso's will out perform 1 8800gt
1 1337_JohnN 1337 §tatus Messages 574 Location Southern California Dec 7, 2008 #13 4850 owns both, and is a cheaper resolution than a 9600GSO SLI.
philbar71 Fully Optimized Messages 4,533 Location Suffolk, VA Dec 7, 2008 #14 um sorry no a 4850 is slower that or equal to 2 9600gso's. and 2 8800gt's will beat the pants off of a 4850.
um sorry no a 4850 is slower that or equal to 2 9600gso's. and 2 8800gt's will beat the pants off of a 4850.
OP OP rave_tech In Runtime Messages 162 Location somwhere out there..... Dec 7, 2008 #15 4850 better than 8800GT i dont think so... 2 x 9600 gso's SLI or 1 x 9800 GTX or 9800 GTX+? and why did they relase the gso? LOL
4850 better than 8800GT i dont think so... 2 x 9600 gso's SLI or 1 x 9800 GTX or 9800 GTX+? and why did they relase the gso? LOL
philbar71 Fully Optimized Messages 4,533 Location Suffolk, VA Dec 7, 2008 #16 1 4850 is better than 1 8800gt, just 8800gt in sli is where it is beaten. the gso is a low/mid range card. 2 9600gso's are faster than a 9800gtx+
1 4850 is better than 1 8800gt, just 8800gt in sli is where it is beaten. the gso is a low/mid range card. 2 9600gso's are faster than a 9800gtx+
1 1337_JohnN 1337 §tatus Messages 574 Location Southern California Dec 7, 2008 #17 2 4850's will make you cry a river, and costs about the price of a GTX260. And ravetech, please use google, it's better for the both of us.
2 4850's will make you cry a river, and costs about the price of a GTX260. And ravetech, please use google, it's better for the both of us.
philbar71 Fully Optimized Messages 4,533 Location Suffolk, VA Dec 7, 2008 #18 what? 1 gtx 260 is cheaper than 2 4850's also rave dont double post use the edit button
OP OP rave_tech In Runtime Messages 162 Location somwhere out there..... Dec 7, 2008 #19 umm no, and just to let you know i have had nothing but bad experiences with ATI.... i dont think there is a card that is faster than the 216 core 280 GTX i think thats the best card around...but pricey....lol EDIT: ok phil.....my fellow nvida guy
umm no, and just to let you know i have had nothing but bad experiences with ATI.... i dont think there is a card that is faster than the 216 core 280 GTX i think thats the best card around...but pricey....lol EDIT: ok phil.....my fellow nvida guy
philbar71 Fully Optimized Messages 4,533 Location Suffolk, VA Dec 7, 2008 #20 um the 4870x2 and 4850x2 are both faster than the gtx 280.