Okay, I've got - don't laugh - Cricket "Broadband" which is half the speed of dialup (on a good day), very unreliable (often disconnects, often "runs" at 0 speed (surely that isn't broadband), or a very low (like under 1k) speed insufficient to load webpages), and way more expensive than dialup.
Yes, I understand that it sucks, and there are plenty of online reviews pointing in this direction.
But exactly WHY does it suck, or more precisely, how (technologically) can it suck as bad as it does?
For some reason I can't even run speedtest.net - I get the fully colored "selecting best server based on ping" map, but it never gets past that point. Pingtest.net gives me ping results from about 200ms to 1100 ms.
Speedtests run on other sites give me results in the neighborhood of 0.05 Mbps down and 0.04 up.
Yes, I understand that it sucks, and there are plenty of online reviews pointing in this direction.
But exactly WHY does it suck, or more precisely, how (technologically) can it suck as bad as it does?
For some reason I can't even run speedtest.net - I get the fully colored "selecting best server based on ping" map, but it never gets past that point. Pingtest.net gives me ping results from about 200ms to 1100 ms.
Speedtests run on other sites give me results in the neighborhood of 0.05 Mbps down and 0.04 up.