J JoshSB Geek Squad Messages 788 Location Ohio Jan 5, 2006 #1 I know one of these 3000+ amd processors is better designed, but forgot which one, building a cheap comp for a buddy so i need to know, any help is appreciated. Thanks guys.
I know one of these 3000+ amd processors is better designed, but forgot which one, building a cheap comp for a buddy so i need to know, any help is appreciated. Thanks guys.
C0RR0SIVE Golden Master Messages 9,213 Location Lexington, KY Jan 5, 2006 #2 Venice is the best one, because you can't buy socket 939 newcastle cores anymore.
P PoisonPorkchop Daemon Poster Messages 994 Jan 5, 2006 #4 I think newcastle is the worst. The problem is, is I have one
S septoid2 Daemon Poster Messages 765 Jan 5, 2006 #5 Its not a huge difference really. Only like SSE3 instructions are missing, and it generates a bit more heat. That could be a problem if overclocking.
Its not a huge difference really. Only like SSE3 instructions are missing, and it generates a bit more heat. That could be a problem if overclocking.
D DJ-CHRIS Golden Master Messages 8,010 Jan 5, 2006 #6 septoid2 said: Its not a huge difference really. Only like SSE3 instructions are missing, and it generates a bit more heat. That could be a problem if overclocking. Click to expand... Memory controllers are different as well.
septoid2 said: Its not a huge difference really. Only like SSE3 instructions are missing, and it generates a bit more heat. That could be a problem if overclocking. Click to expand... Memory controllers are different as well.
tajahem In Runtime Messages 410 Jan 5, 2006 #7 If I had to do it all over again I would go Venice or Winchester and definately not Newcastle.
F FghtinIrshNvrDi Fully Optimized Messages 3,453 Jan 5, 2006 #10 If you're running stock, you'll not even notice a difference. When it comes to overclocking... Venice is you baby. Ryan
If you're running stock, you'll not even notice a difference. When it comes to overclocking... Venice is you baby. Ryan