T tomc102968 In Runtime Messages 145 Jul 7, 2008 #1 mods feel free to move to appropriate area 58 58 51 49 quad core 6600 kentsfield celcius are the bad? thanks tom
mods feel free to move to appropriate area 58 58 51 49 quad core 6600 kentsfield celcius are the bad? thanks tom
CrazeD Fully Optimized Messages 3,736 Location Maine Jul 7, 2008 #2 Is this at 100% load (all 4 cores)? Cores 2 and 3 (I'm guessing) are a lot lower, maybe indicating an uneven cooler. But, all temps are within the safe range. 0 and 1 are a little warm, but should be fine.
Is this at 100% load (all 4 cores)? Cores 2 and 3 (I'm guessing) are a lot lower, maybe indicating an uneven cooler. But, all temps are within the safe range. 0 and 1 are a little warm, but should be fine.
L lukas Daemon Poster Messages 651 Location Manchester, england Jul 8, 2008 #3 them chips can withstand heat up to 80C so no need to worrie until you pass 70ish, might be wrong but heard them chips can take alot of heat, try re-seating your HS which should improve temps
them chips can withstand heat up to 80C so no need to worrie until you pass 70ish, might be wrong but heard them chips can take alot of heat, try re-seating your HS which should improve temps
thirdshiftdj I feel funny... Messages 3,808 Location Lowell,Ma Jul 8, 2008 #4 I hope thats under load, otherwise those temps are bad