Nubius Golden Master Messages 11,599 Mar 1, 2005 #11 Winchester simply because of OC'ability. Thus far I've seen the FX-55 referred to as newcastle, sledghammer, and clawhammer in this thread...... and the winner is......CLAWHAMMER!
Winchester simply because of OC'ability. Thus far I've seen the FX-55 referred to as newcastle, sledghammer, and clawhammer in this thread...... and the winner is......CLAWHAMMER!
D DJ-CHRIS Golden Master Messages 8,010 Mar 1, 2005 #12 No sledgehammer won Proof http://www.singsingsing.com/has5/computerwithsledgehammer.jpg The picture was too big, and i wasnt resizing it (i cant). Time to lighten this thread up
No sledgehammer won Proof http://www.singsingsing.com/has5/computerwithsledgehammer.jpg The picture was too big, and i wasnt resizing it (i cant). Time to lighten this thread up
Nubius Golden Master Messages 11,599 Mar 1, 2005 #13 lol...I see shotgun shells...sure it isn't the FX-55 'DoubleBarrel'
aj2003 Daemon Poster Messages 1,094 Mar 1, 2005 #14 yea i thought it was a clawhammer http://www.techwarelabs.com/reviews/processors/amd4000_fx55/index_4.shtml arent the new dual cores gonna get very very hot, they should produce about twice as much heat or there about.?
yea i thought it was a clawhammer http://www.techwarelabs.com/reviews/processors/amd4000_fx55/index_4.shtml arent the new dual cores gonna get very very hot, they should produce about twice as much heat or there about.?
D DJ-CHRIS Golden Master Messages 8,010 Mar 1, 2005 #15 No offense but those people and their views on cool and quiet are bad. They say at that speed (1.2ghz and 1.0 V-CORE) it competes witht he top end pentium's. With cool and quiet, whenever your not using your CPU it underclocks it.
No offense but those people and their views on cool and quiet are bad. They say at that speed (1.2ghz and 1.0 V-CORE) it competes witht he top end pentium's. With cool and quiet, whenever your not using your CPU it underclocks it.