which os is the best? - Page 2 - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Software > Microsoft Windows and Software
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 03-01-2006, 06:42 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master Techie
 
baronvongogo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: United Kingdom, Warrington
Posts: 2,756
Default

personally I love xp does the job just fine.

I hear good things about windows 2000 although some games arnt compatible such as starlancer although it is old

Linux is ok but wasnt too my taste its great if you want to customise your pc to perfection but otherwise I stick to xp suits me fine.
__________________

__________________
baronvongogo is offline  
Old 03-01-2006, 06:50 PM   #12 (permalink)
It's all just 1s and 0s
 
office politics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: in the lab
Posts: 6,555
Send a message via MSN to office politics
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by jbc
Windows 2K, for some odd reason, has a lot less security holes in it then XP does. Microsoft insereted a lot of security threats when it produced XP. I have aslo been told that security threats are a Microsoft phonemena. I have been told that Linux doesn't have security holes like Microsoft does. I have been told in the past two years there has been a sum total of three patches for Linux compared to the 120 for Windows there appears to be no contest from a security standpoint. I am seriously thinking of getting Linux pre-installed on my next computer.

maybe you should do your own research before posting crap like this.

2000 has more security holes than xp. Highly doubtful. I've never ran the numbers but i do administer a SUS server. My guess is that there's more 2000 patches than xp.

MS inserted security threats with xp. I was reading the other day that MS used 2000 as a codebase for xp. So maybe a 1/2 truth but sp2's main goal was to eliminate security problems.

Security threats are only a MS issue. Don't be so naive. http://search.cert.org/query.html?co...set=iso-8859-1
__________________

office politics is offline  
Old 03-01-2006, 08:49 PM   #13 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,915
Send a message via Yahoo to talldude123
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Ihatewalmart
i just got windows 2000 with SP4
good job, you'll notice a large difference in speed, compared to XP.
talldude123 is offline  
Old 03-01-2006, 09:25 PM   #14 (permalink)
Super Techie
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 303
Send a message via AIM to s0me0ne Send a message via Yahoo to s0me0ne
Default

jbc - windows had more patches because the make everything. Your not going to see patches for apache under kernel.org. People say linux machine dont get hacked, whare did the term rooting come from?
__________________
Anal nerd who can\'t spell.
s0me0ne is offline  
Old 03-02-2006, 01:47 AM   #15 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 808
Default

I LIKE WALMART
derrmc is offline  
Old 03-02-2006, 04:40 AM   #16 (permalink)
Junior Techie
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 60
Default

The best version i think is Windows XP pro X64 works really well and is quick!
matthab is offline  
Old 03-02-2006, 02:34 PM   #17 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,915
Send a message via Yahoo to talldude123
Default

i like wal-mart too, they're cheap.

matthab - most people dont have a computer that can handle XP 64-bit, because its expensive...
__________________

talldude123 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.