Activision Finds New Way to Monetize 'Call of Duty'

[skitzo385]

Activision Finds New Way to Monetize 'Call of Duty' - Video Games Blog Plugged In - Yahoo! Games

"Call of Duty" might be the best selling franchise in the video game industry, but Activision-Blizzard is looking to double down on its earnings potential.

The company has unveiled a subscription-based online service called "Call of Duty: Elite" that will provide extra content for players, including map packs and social network functionality for players.

Due to launch this fall alongside "Modern Warfare 3," the next installment in the series, "Elite" will not only give players access to downloadable content for the game, but will offer in-depth tracking of player statistics and an advanced matchmaking service, letting people play multiplayer games with friends or opponents with similar skills.

People who do not subscribe to the service will still be able to play the games online for free.

Analysts have been expecting the move for some time and say Activision-Blizzard seems to have modest initial aspirations for the service, but the company expects to grow "Elite" substantially in the years to come.



Highest Grossing Games



"I think Activision hopes to get up to 1 million subscribers this year," says Michael Pachter of Wedbush Securities, who predicted the company would begin offering a subscription service for "Call of Duty" last year. "From there, they hope to get it up to 3 million next year, then up to 5 million. Over time, they'd like to migrate everyone over to it."

Activision has not yet announced what Elite's monthly subscription fee will be, though analysts expect the charge to be between $5 and $8 per month.

That would be on top of the $60 players pay for the original game - and, if their preferred platform is Microsoft's Xbox 360, they're likely also paying $60 per year for Xbox Live (which allows them to play online).

That starts to become a high price to pay a video game, but "Call of Duty" has long since transcended the "just a game" category. The franchise has sold over 100 million copies - and when new versions come out each November, they cement a spot at the top of the sales charts for months. Over 7 million people play "Call of Duty" games every day, spending hundreds of hours playing multiplayer matches.

It's a regular habit, too. Activision says the average customer spends 58 minutes per day playing the game - more time than most people spend on Facebook.

While "Elite" is an ambitious effort, it's one that could have a long-term impact on the stock, says Pachter.

"I think they're in this for the long run," he says. "For their next [fiscal] year, 1 million subscribers [to Elite] is about an added 3 cents per share. It's meaningful, but who knows ultimately if they'll end up with 1 million or 10 million."

At its heart, "Elite" appears to be a slightly more robust community than the one that is currently offered for free to players of games like Bungie Software's "Halo" and Blizzard's "Starcraft". That might cause some grumbling from players who are reluctant to pay more for the game, but the success of "Elite" could have an impact on free services like that.

Modern Warfare 2 Blizzard, after all, is already a part of Activision. And Bungie has signed a long-term deal with the publisher that will see the two working together for the next 10 years.

"The reason the Bungie guys went to Activision is they're psyched to start charging for their stuff," says Pachter. "Blizzard's kind of going that way, too, with all of the customizable stuff on 'Starcraft'."

Activision is launching Elite - and its added services - at a critical time in "Call of Duty's" evolution. The game is expected to see its most serious competition to date this year, when Electronic Arts launches "Battlefield 3" against "Modern Warfare 3".

"This November we're launching Battlefield 3," said EA CEO John Riccitiello at the Ad Age Digital Conference in April. "It's going up against the next Call of Duty, which is presently the number one game in the game industry. ... [Battlefield 3] is designed to take that game down. If you're looking for a battle of the titans, a Red Sox versus Yankees, if you're trying to understand if it's Microsoft versus Google and what the tip-off point is for this holiday season - this is it."

Lame?

 

[Slaymate]

I guess I won't be playing the new Call of Duty.

 

[BloodyMercy]

Agreed. If I pay you to buy the game how can you justify charging me to play it? I can understand to a point when they charge for the server use on WoW (Which I don't play.), because they econstantly add to and update the service. With that said it sounds like subscribing to this 'elite' program will give you free DLC at the very least a discount. But when it comes down to it and they only release two packs at 15$ a piece on the network what is the point? Personally the CoD franchise is so washed out at this point I wasn't interested to begin with. Not to mention the fact that (again IMO) the only good developer is gone. Well it survives in name only... Infinty Ward was the only good thing about the franchise, all of them sold well and people seemed to enjoy them but Treyarch is a flop. World @ War was COD4 with different skins, there was absolutely no difference aside from zombies. Even Infinty Ward failed in my eyes... I played CoD:MW for about 1 1/2 years, CoD MW2 for about 6 months. They just don't add to it, the only thing that kept me going for so long with the franchise was the epic SP Campaigns. Which Black Ops was just too cut up, there wasn't enough chronology..and the JFK conspiracy is so lost at this point I was a little disgusted... but for it's own worth at least Treyarch out did their flop WaW...

*edit* and gamestop still gives you ~25$ for a good copy...Score!...

 

[Abstract Hero]

I posted this in the news section yesterday. lol

You won't be charged to play the game. You can play it online and offline for free. BUT if you want extras like map packs and weapons and community junk... it'll cost you.

 

[Druid]

Agreed. If I pay you to buy the game how can you justify charging me to play it? I can understand to a point when they charge for the server use on WoW (Which I don't play.), because they econstantly add to and update the service. With that said it sounds like subscribing to this 'elite' program will give you free DLC at the very least a discount. But when it comes down to it and they only release two packs at 15$ a piece on the network what is the point? Personally the CoD franchise is so washed out at this point I wasn't interested to begin with. Not to mention the fact that (again IMO) the only good developer is gone. Well it survives in name only... Infinty Ward was the only good thing about the franchise, all of them sold well and people seemed to enjoy them but Treyarch is a flop. World @ War was COD4 with different skins, there was absolutely no difference aside from zombies. Even Infinty Ward failed in my eyes... I played CoD:MW for about 1 1/2 years, CoD MW2 for about 6 months. They just don't add to it, the only thing that kept me going for so long with the franchise was the epic SP Campaigns. Which Black Ops was just too cut up, there wasn't enough chronology..and the JFK conspiracy is so lost at this point I was a little disgusted... but for it's own worth at least Treyarch out did their flop WaW...

*edit* and gamestop still gives you ~25$ for a good copy...Score!...

WaW wasn't purely a skin. Mostly yes, but Treyarch took an entirely different approach to designing their maps. They took a more realistic approach to the environments where there were much more possible routes, making the game more about gun skill then knowing the routes and waiting for people to come down them like in mw and mw2. Black ops took more of a turn towards this, but is still about gun skill. I'm a gun skill kind of guy, so I'm almost invincible in WaW. It's my favorite one.

 

[skitzo385]

I posted this in the news section yesterday. lol

You won't be charged to play the game. You can play it online and offline for free. BUT if you want extras like map packs and weapons and community junk... it'll cost you.

Sorry, do not look at the news area. Thought I finally found something first! :-/

 

[Trotter]

You won't be charged to play the game. You can play it online and offline for free. BUT if you want extras like map packs and weapons and community junk... it'll cost you.

Don't they already charge for maps/map packs? The rest sounds like micro-transactions which are alrady used by quite a few games (especially RPGs and "free to play" platforms).

It doesn't bother me as I do not like the COD games. I prefer to come in guns blazing, not hiding in a corner and shooting whoever comes by.

 

[Abstract Hero]

Don't they already charge for maps/map packs? The rest sounds like micro-transactions which are alrady used by quite a few games (especially RPGs and "free to play" platforms).

It doesn't bother me as I do not like the COD games. I prefer to come in guns blazing, not hiding in a corner and shooting whoever comes by.

I think these are gonna be Elite exclusive maps. Like I bet Elite will get the packs months in advance whil the regulars wil get them once the hype dies.

Trotter, you and I, BF3, it's on.

 

[skitzo385]

I think these are gonna be Elite exclusive maps. Like I bet Elite will get the packs months in advance whil the regulars wil get them once the hype dies.

Trotter, you and I, BF3, it's on.

I am thinking BF3 as well but I am not a huge fan of vehicles in mutliplayer and my friends are against them all together so I am not sure yet. Will have to wait for more info on both...

 

[SuperWarehouse]

This could backfire big time for Activision, especially as EA is readying Battlefield 3 (the major CoD competitor) with a $100 million advertising campaign.