Q quest1on In Runtime Messages 396 Jan 28, 2006 #1 i know the 2 gig would be better but is it worth the extra money? becuzz i see lot of ppl with a 2x 512 and less ppl with 2x1024
i know the 2 gig would be better but is it worth the extra money? becuzz i see lot of ppl with a 2x 512 and less ppl with 2x1024
K KryptoKnight In Runtime Messages 303 Jan 28, 2006 #2 well, it is for the future, and bf2 will be perfect with it. Otherwise, if you don't have the money, get the 2x 512
well, it is for the future, and bf2 will be perfect with it. Otherwise, if you don't have the money, get the 2x 512
N NeedAcpu Daemon Poster Messages 738 Jan 28, 2006 #4 2gb its very useful if playing all the new games.
PP Mguire Build Guru Messages 32,592 Location Fort Worth, Texas Jan 28, 2006 #5 Plain and simple, for any upcoming game and today games 2gig is a must have for good performance.
F ffmedic12 Baseband Member Messages 78 Jan 28, 2006 #6 Is it better to have 4x512 on the four dimms or better to go w/ 2x1024 on 2 dimms?
S Sport1031 Daemon Poster Messages 587 Jan 28, 2006 #7 I dont think that there would be a performance difference between those two setups, but 2 x 1024 would probably be cheaper.
I dont think that there would be a performance difference between those two setups, but 2 x 1024 would probably be cheaper.
F FghtinIrshNvrDi Fully Optimized Messages 3,453 Jan 28, 2006 #8 2x1024 is better. It slows the machine down a hair if it has to search in all 4 ram slots. You have to run it in 2T. Ryan
2x1024 is better. It slows the machine down a hair if it has to search in all 4 ram slots. You have to run it in 2T. Ryan
K Kitire In Runtime Messages 350 Jan 28, 2006 #9 ... How much more expensive is a single 1gb stick? I want to upgrade to 2gb soon.