Tyler1989 said:Computer no questions asked.
umm ya that is kinda retarded. consloes right now ARE more powerful than a PC, and at a fraction of the price, please refer to my last postTyler1989 said:Computer no questions asked.
003 said:well, we all know that the consloes right now are more powerful than a pc, and the pcs are also way more expensive, but like i've said before, this is a COMPUTER forum, full of computer enthusiasts, and computers WILL eventually catch up the consoles. it's all a matter of time. but even when they do catch up the consoles will still be way cheaper, but again, this IS a computer forum after all
Flanker said:Yea, its fanboys like you who piss me off
Prove it. Can't can you? Thats what I thought. You idiots accuse everypme else of being Nvidia fanboys, or ATi fanboys, or Intel Fanboys, but you're all PC fanboys. Grow up for god's sake. Open your fvcking eyes.
Flanker said:Yea, its fanboys like you who piss me off
bball100 said:show me some statistics or benches saying consoles own computers. calm down a little too, you have a lot of anger when he was just stating his opinion dont go off like he's trying to p*ss you off he was just stating his opinion.
killians45 said:As of now, the architecture is VERY effecient (in instructional execution, that is not in the time it takes to program) and like stated by others, has an incredible future when the hardware is taken full advantage of. Also, as far as it taking a long time to program, most companies are employing more programmers on a single project, thus the increase in game prices. Now, onto how long it will take for the PC to catch up. You MUST understand the architecture of this system to fully appreciate it, that includes how the cache system works in conjunction with the GPU (amazing bit of engineering), environemental synthesis, thread handling, unified shading, etc. For a PC to do this, you are looking at MANY changes having to be made. A MBD to support this architecture, the machine level instructions able to support many different developers of graphics cards, think about the problems that will arise making not just one system with such a specialized MBD, but being able to make MANY various card manufacturers communicate. The new architecture and low level languages make this a daunting task. So, not only the technological level is causing a road block for this, but the many different types of developers and making the os stable enough to handle it. Not to mention, will the major public do a complete overhaul of not just a processor, but new everything that will not be as user friendly to swap parts for as its predecessor?
killians45 said:Now, PC compared to them? No contest, the next generation consoles will dominate. Eventually, as always happens, the PC market will catch up and surpass the console market. However, with this current console generation I wouldn't look at it happening as quickly as it usually does and eventually the console life span will eventually equal that of the PC where its hardware will infact be good for 5 years.
Vybuni said:If anything, it seems like your the fanboy. Is there something wrong with liking computers??? Everyone is entitled to an opinion, just as you are. I, as many, know that the consoles are at the top in raw power, but they are extremely limited in terms of use. I hope you know that this isnt just a gaming forum, but people come here for other reasons. Can you do 3D modeling, CAD, Photoshop, etc on an Xbox 360 or PS3. No.
And yes, these threads should be stopped.