AMD delays Phenom 9700 into Q2 2008

Status
Not open for further replies.
While Tom's Hardware benchmarks proves that phenom scales worse than Athlon64 with higher freq in most applications
Oh, and I'm sure ALL programs are optimised for quad core processors, right?
take a look at single core vs single core, dual core vs dual core.

Then don't post incorrect information
Et tu, maroon1. Et tu.

Thats what people always say when they can't prove their points
That's right, pretend there are NO other possible reasons for not wanting to argue.

Oh, how about:
1. there is no point
2. it takes time and effort, which I could use for something else.
And you were attacking Intel by posting incorrect information like "Nehalem will come out on Mid 2009" and "scales better than C2Q"
It wasn't an attack on product X. It's promoting product Y.

And I still say that it isn't incorrect. But you'll never listen, so I won't bother.
 
But you'll never listen,

LOL ^

Listen to what ?!

All articles that I posted saying that the first Nehalem is coming on Q4 2008

Even the article you posted is saying the same thing !!!

And you still think that what you posted is correct !

And about freq scaling, I already showed you a proof that Phenom scale worse than Athlon64 in most applications

You claimed that phenom performs much better with DDR2-1066 than DDR2-800 without showing us any proof !! How can we know that you are right if you can't show us any proof ?!
 
LOL !!!

Listen to what ?!
Ha. that'd be right.

All articles that I posted saying that the fist Nehalem is coming on Q4 2008
Oh, pretend that's even the main argument.
That's called being obtuse.
And about freq scaling, I already showed you a proof that Phenom scale worse than Athlon64 in most applications
And I already showed you a thread talking specifically about Phenom scaling that says a different thing.

You claimed that phenom performs much better with DDR2-1066 than DDR2-800 without showing us any proof !! How can we know that you are right if you can't post us any proof ?!
How about you go looking for it yourself?
 
Thread closed due to persistant argueing. Let's not have another casualty.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom