Good Fps' low price

MikeReiner

Golden Master
Messages
5,055
freestyler105 said:
Counter Strike is only $10
http://www.steampowered.com/v/index.php?area=game&AppId=10&

Halo PC $20 and it's free online unlike the Xbox version
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/t...745434-9616024?v=glance&s=videogames&n=507846

Unreal Tournament 2004 $20
http://www.amazon.com/Atari-Unreal-Tournament-2004-CD-ROM/dp/B0000BVGOM

Call of Duty $15
http://www.amazon.com/Activision-Call-Duty-Game-Year/dp/B0000C6EB4

Jedi Knight: Jedi Outcast $10
http://www.amazon.com/Star-Wars-Kni..._1_1/104-5434168-9251135?ie=UTF8&s=videogames

Those are my personal favorites that would work with the computer listed in your profile.
I disagree. That video card would run ut04 horribly, halopc would be ok with the settings down.

and by horribly I mean it would run like crap at the BARE MIN settings.
 

freestyler105

Golden Master
Messages
7,883
It meets the minimum requirements for UT2004 and Halo PC, and that's was I was listing. Obviously, if you want high settings, you are going to have to spend some money on hardware.
 

MikeReiner

Golden Master
Messages
5,055
freestyler105 said:
It meets the minimum requirements for UT2004 and Halo PC, and that's was I was listing. Obviously, if you want high settings, you are going to have to spend some money on hardware.
yeah well, thing is, a 64 mb geforce 4 or something would run it ok at low settings.. but i've seen ut2004 on a radeon 7500... and it runs horrible.. borderline unplayable.. which isn't fun :\
 

X1337

Fully Optimized
Messages
2,008
MikeReiner said:
yeah well, thing is, a 64 mb geforce 4 or something would run it ok at low settings.. but i've seen ut2004 on a radeon 7500... and it runs horrible.. borderline unplayable.. which isn't fun :\
I ran F.E.A.R With Max Settings @ 1280x1024 with soft shadows and AA 6x - AF 16x. I got around 18 to 14 frames and I still owned some good players. For me, 30 frames isn't fast for me when I get into the game. Its 40 or higher that gets me going and also the type of game that I like (CSS - Racing)
 

Spartan109

Fully Optimized
Messages
2,103
Location
Canada
MikeReiner said:
yeah well, thing is, a 64 mb geforce 4 or something would run it ok at low settings.. but i've seen ut2004 on a radeon 7500... and it runs horrible.. borderline unplayable.. which isn't fun :\
the demo works just fine on my comp(with the catalist 5.9 driver)
 

allenn812

Daemon Poster
Messages
935
X1337 said:
I ran F.E.A.R With Max Settings @ 1280x1024 with soft shadows and AA 6x - AF 16x. I got around 18 to 14 frames and I still owned some good players. For me, 30 frames isn't fast for me when I get into the game. Its 40 or higher that gets me going and also the type of game that I like (CSS - Racing)
Wow, was that the biggest lie ever.
 

X1337

Fully Optimized
Messages
2,008
mongoman said:
the demo works just fine on my comp(with the catalist 5.9 driver)
How much frames? Take a screen shot in Fraps

if you dont know how to enable numbers on your picture, use this:




allenn812 said:
Wow, was that the biggest lie ever.
how the hell is it a lie. My X1600Pro cant get any faster and 30 frames is slow to me. Its just how I see things and if you think that im wrong than that is your own opinion
 

MikeReiner

Golden Master
Messages
5,055
X1337 said:
I ran F.E.A.R With Max Settings @ 1280x1024 with soft shadows and AA 6x - AF 16x. I got around 18 to 14 frames and I still owned some good players. For me, 30 frames isn't fast for me when I get into the game. Its 40 or higher that gets me going and also the type of game that I like (CSS - Racing)
Thats nice. You have a X1600Pro. he has a 7500.
 

X1337

Fully Optimized
Messages
2,008
MikeReiner said:
shoving a GeForce4 Ti4200 in there made a world of difference.
yep, My old Ti 4200 (250/500) 128MB / 128-Bit played CSS @ 1024x768 with medium settings with good frame rate
 
Top