Sure, sometimes they can interfere with the whole driving experience and then it's not so good. Traction control that doesn't let you go more than 30 round bends for example? Complete crap. Clever, non-invasive traction control that let's you slide out a bit but steps in if you're about to go hurtling off the edge of a cliff? I really don't see the issue with that. Sure, there are some out there that would always prefer no driver aids in the slightest. But the fact is however good a driver you are you can't monitor the speed and traction of each wheel hundreds of times a second and adjust the power going to each wheel to suit. Computers can, and therefore if the algorithms are coded well (and they're getting better all the time) they should theoretically be able to keep the car in control and work out when it's about to go out of control far better than any human can. I'm not saying we're there yet, but in my view saying that all supercars should be stripped of all their driver aids seems to lend itself more towards a cainophobic viewpoint than a puristic one.