amd now..amd then

[zoomtm]

look at the power of AMD 10 years ago able to run a current OS:

not a fake..its looks fake cuz the pc can only do 16bit color and not 32bit lol

 

[David Lindon]

Wow, 166MHz!

 

[athlon64fx]

hrrrm, the resolution sampling differnce between the desktop and the my comp applet is fishy there!

also that looks more liek skinned windows 2000 rather than xp.

 

[athlon64fx]

and the processor naming conventions for that processor arent reported like that. and it dont say multimeida extentions. Ive seen one in action on windows 2000 and it just said k6

 

[zoomtm]

yea i edited out the registered to in paint cuz its a school computer...thats why it looks weird..but its not fake

 

[athlon64fx]

really??? got any other proof??

 

[athlon64fx]

if thats true that pushing it!!

must be a crappy school system!

 

[zoomtm]

lol athlon windows 2k and xp report the cpu names TOTALLY different...

this is what its running on (i put the amd in it and took the pentium out ):

 

[setishock]

Please...

Next time you post a pic, reduce the size to fit on the forums.

 

[athlon64fx]

well im running 1280x1024 res right now and its practically the avaerage resolution now!