PP Mguire Build Guru Messages 32,591 Location Fort Worth, Texas Jul 8, 2006 #41 They will make a Conroe that will smoke that too
J j4ckaL Daemon Poster Messages 718 Jul 8, 2006 #42 Maybe but thats not the point. I'm waiting for AMD to be on top again because #1 I don't have the money for a new PC right now anyway, and #2 I just like AMD better.
Maybe but thats not the point. I'm waiting for AMD to be on top again because #1 I don't have the money for a new PC right now anyway, and #2 I just like AMD better.
G gaara Fully Optimized Messages 3,789 Location Canada Jul 8, 2006 #43 You guys are still in denial of the benchmarks? Wow. Ridiculous. Click to expand... You can't benchmark the quality of non-existant boards
You guys are still in denial of the benchmarks? Wow. Ridiculous. Click to expand... You can't benchmark the quality of non-existant boards
I Infomatic Banned Messages 232 Jul 8, 2006 #44 gaara said: You can't benchmark the quality of non-existant boards Click to expand... Its called the Intel BadAxe.
gaara said: You can't benchmark the quality of non-existant boards Click to expand... Its called the Intel BadAxe.
OP OP L Lord AnthraX Fully Optimized Messages 2,992 Jul 8, 2006 #45 joshd said: well we have already seen Kentsfield benchies. I belive that it was a Kentsfield that broke 10s SuperPI 1M. It looks pretty fast. Click to expand... Yeah but super PI isnt multithreaded so it was basically a conroe right?
joshd said: well we have already seen Kentsfield benchies. I belive that it was a Kentsfield that broke 10s SuperPI 1M. It looks pretty fast. Click to expand... Yeah but super PI isnt multithreaded so it was basically a conroe right?
C0RR0SIVE Golden Master Messages 9,213 Location Lexington, KY Jul 8, 2006 #46 Ok... how about a 6000+ AMD processor... lol
I Infomatic Banned Messages 232 Jul 9, 2006 #47 That would get beaten by the 2.93Ghz XE, lol. They're probably be the same though, since that would be a 3.75Ghz A64, and would take a 2.88Ghz Conroe to beat.
That would get beaten by the 2.93Ghz XE, lol. They're probably be the same though, since that would be a 3.75Ghz A64, and would take a 2.88Ghz Conroe to beat.
OP OP L Lord AnthraX Fully Optimized Messages 2,992 Jul 9, 2006 #48 Since the conroe is 65 nanometer does that mean is gives off lest heat output then say a 95NM AMD?
I Infomatic Banned Messages 232 Jul 9, 2006 #49 90nm AMD* And yes, it does. The Conroe gives of less heat than A64 processors.
A AnthraX Daemon Poster Messages 969 Jul 9, 2006 #50 Hence why it does so well overclocking on air, correct?