64 bit vs 32 bit

Zapdos

In Runtime
Messages
407
I was wondering if someone could clarify the differences. And yes i know its a newb question but I dont understand it.
 

superman22x

Golden Master
Messages
7,904
Well from the sounds of it, 64 bit is supposed to be faster. I cant see a big diffrence. Thats about it. Things are supposed to be much more 64bit oriented once vista is out. So 64 bit might be the way to go now.
 

Celegorm

Site Team
Staff member
Messages
11,741
Location
USA
64bit is a little faster. Thearetically it can handle twice the data at once (my guess is probally about 1.5x the data over 32 bit is what your actually getting)

if you have a newer processor, odds are its 64 bit, so you might as well get a 64bit vista to utilize it. That is, if you plan on getting vista.
 

Mattyl110792

Daemon Poster
Messages
1,027
Well, i have the Athon 64 4200 which is 64-bit and i installed XP Pro 64-bit edition on it, and didn't notice any speed differences. THis is probably because most software is only now starting to release stuff that utilizes the 64-bits, whereas most of the stuff is 32-bit, which makes the 64 useless really. But as the previous poster said, now that Vista is coming out, i guess things will use 64-bit more, so in coming months, yes there will be a good difference.

Matt
 

compguy91

Fully Optimized
Messages
2,415
64 bit can handle larger amounts of data. For example, windows XP 32 bit can only handle 2GB of RAM, it can handle more but it will only address 2GB I believe. It's possible to have more on a 32 bit system but there are stability issues from what I've read of people using 3 or 4GB or more. 64 bit XP on the other hand can handle up to 128GB of RAM and 16TB storage. I'm not entirely sure on the whole 64 bit thing either but that's what I can gather from it.
 
Top