Firefox and Mac security sanctuaries 'under attack'

Status
Not open for further replies.

Osiris

Golden Master
Messages
36,817
Location
Kentucky
Symantec has attacked the perceived security advantages of Firefox and Apple Macs by drawing unfavourable comparisons with Microsoft's software and describing Mac fans as living in a "false paradise". According to the latest edition of Symantec's Internet Security Threat Report, 25 vulnerabilities were disclosed for Mozilla browsers and 13 for Microsoft Internet Explorer in the first half of 2005.

Graham Pinkney, head of threat intelligence EMEA at Symantec, said that switching from IE to Firefox as a way of minimising security risks was no longer valid advice. "Cross-site scripting attacks have been used to attack more vulnerabilities in Mozilla browsers over the last six months than IE," Pinkney told an IDC security conference last week ahead of the publication of Symantec's threat report today. John Cheney, chief executive of email filtering firm BlackSpider, replied that the release of Firefox had "helped Microsoft to raise its game" in terms of browser security.

As well as making comments that will doubtless irk Firefox fans, Symantec has renewed its assault of the perceived security advantages of Apple Macs. "Mac users may be operating under a false sense of security as a noteworthy number of vulnerabilities and attacks were detected against Apple MacÂ’s operating system, OS X," Symantec said, reflecting comments in the previous edition of its threat report that OS X was an emerging target for attack.

"While the number of vendor-confirmed vulnerabilities in OS X has remained relatively constant during the last two reporting periods [12 months], Symantec predicts this could change in the future. SymantecÂ’s analysis on a rootkit (OSX/Weapox) reveals it is designed to take advantage of OS X. This particular trojan demonstrates that as OS X increases in popularity, so too will the scrutiny it receives from potential attackers."

Away from the desktop, Microsoft enterprise applications remain the top hacker target. For the fourth consecutive reporting period, the Microsoft SQL Server Resolution Service Stack Overflow Attack was the most common attack, accounting for 33 per cent of all attacks monitored by Symantec.

Malware authors go modular
Malicious code threats to privacy and confidentiality increased rapidly in the first six months of 2005 - up 48 per cent on the back half of 2004. Virus writers upped their production lines to release 10,866 new Windows virus and worm variants in the first six months of this year, Symantec reports.

For the second period in succession, NetSky-P was the most reported malicious code sample. Gaobot and Spybot - both linked to the creation of zombie networks of compromised Windows PCs - were the second and third most reported.

Malware that exposes confidential user information represented three-quarters (74 per cent) of the top 50 malicious code samples received by Symantec. Seven of the top 50 were linked to the creation of botnets. Websites that specialise in distributing source code and tools for malicious bots and botnets helped fuel the creation of multiple copies of Spybot with 6,361 new variants of the malware created in the first half of 2005, a 48 per cent increase over the 4,288 new variants documented in the second half of 2004.

Instead of releasing a wide range of functions in one program or file, virus writers are beginning to create modular code to avoid detection. Once installed, modular malware first tries to disable antivirus software and firewall protection and then trieas to download other pieces (or modules) of code from compromised computers across the internet.

A patch in time...
Symantec chronicled 1,862 new vulnerabilities during 1H2005 - an average of 10 new flaws a day – 73 per cent of which it categorises as easily exploitable. The time between the disclosure of a vulnerability and the release of an associated exploit was just six days. Half (59 per cent) of vulnerabilities were associated with web application technologies.

Along with computer viruses and vulnerabilities, spam remains a leading security concern. Spam accounted for 61 per cent of all email traffic in the first half of 2005, according to Symantec, with over half (51 per cent) of all junk mail received worldwide originated in the US.
 
Cross-site scripting attacks have been used to attack more vulnerabilities in Mozilla browsers over the last six months than IE"

So all you fearless FF users out there that think FF has taken over the world, what do you have to say about this or is this just jibbirish to you and dont mean nothing becasue FF is still safer...
 
Away from the desktop, Microsoft enterprise applications remain the top hacker target.

This is why you see more patches, etc than FF, because its number one
 
This should be a warning to all the Mac users. Be prepared for all the scrunity that you put us Windows users through for our OS you are going to most likely be getting attacked. That means you will have to start asking "Which is the best antivirus?" questions yourself soon.
 
let see..

25 hole in FF


18,255,899 in IE since it's inception

25 holes promptly patched by FF developers

I.E. well they really didn't give a dam about the holes, until FF came out and stole millions of users. then they address IE problems

I'm sticking with firefox

MAC's well if I had one I would stick with it too. it's still safer than windows straight out the box.

windows will always be the unsafest OS system to use as they will always insist on tracking your activities and people will always exploit that.

what Symantec is basic saying is...

since we found a few holes in FF and MACS, that windows is safer. that what they are implying, even though they say different later.

they are looking at the situation with tunnel vision. they see what they only want to see
 
More people use Windows and Internet explorer than Mac or Firefox so of course Microsoft is going to be targeted. Now that more people are using Mac and FF, hackers are going to start exploiting things from that software. It doesnt matter what you use, if more than enough people use a particular product, it will be hacked. end of story.
 
Shawn summed it up. And for people to say Symantec to attack FF and Mac sounds like a correct statment. Propaganda I tell ya.
 
SHAWN said:
More people use Windows and Internet explorer than Mac or Firefox so of course Microsoft is going to be targeted. Now that more people are using Mac and FF, hackers are going to start exploiting things from that software. It doesnt matter what you use, if more than enough people use a particular product, it will be hacked. end of story.

not really

duckey said:
Shawn summed it up. And for people to say Symantec to attack FF and Mac sounds like a correct statment. Propaganda I tell ya.

no. you guys act like you thought that those products were unhackable.

Duh. Newsflash

Anything written with code can be hacked

you guy missed the point that these products are safer straight out of the box. you will need to configure them properly and add protection to them(Ii.e. Spyware,A/V, firewall, etc), just like you do any other software. MS will alway care more about tracking than security. they own the market so they don't care because people are going to buy the product anyway.

period.
now it's end of story
 
OMG VIROUSES? SPYWARE? FIREFOX ISNT SAFE OUT OF THE BOX!!!

im such a noob i totaly forgot about these and know i have all these errors.

ever thought people choose firefox for its features not security? anyone with half as much witts as you would know that looking at pr0n and play online poker will give you spyware out the wazoo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom