Hi there,
I was recently asked to help a family member, who is a technophobe and very much a beginner, update his ISP from dialup to Comcast broadband. The PC had an unused, expired 2006 edition of Norton installed, and I began the uninstall process to replace it with the free McAfee provided by Comcast.
The uninstall asked for the software disc, and it was then that I learned that the Norton was not owned by him and the install disc was at the home of another relative. Pirated. So I said, great, get the disc and I'll come back to complete this.
To make a long story short, the family member who owns the software talked him into keeping the Norton and convinced him that not only is it the best choice, but that only the software is necessary, no subscription to Norton is actually needed. I tried to convince him otherwise and explain the importance of proper virus protection, especially with constant connectedness of broadband, but it fell on deaf ears and I had to ultimately back off to keep peace in the family.
So my question is, how bad is this going to get? I'm still expected to keep this system running, I just get no control or choice over the virus protection. I know that Comcast is fairly (overly) proactive about diverting rogue stuff from their system, but I feel like this is a very serious open risk and trouble will be quickly forthcoming.
P.S. I forgot to say... the OS is XP, not Vista... so nothing but a personal firewall offered there.
I was recently asked to help a family member, who is a technophobe and very much a beginner, update his ISP from dialup to Comcast broadband. The PC had an unused, expired 2006 edition of Norton installed, and I began the uninstall process to replace it with the free McAfee provided by Comcast.
The uninstall asked for the software disc, and it was then that I learned that the Norton was not owned by him and the install disc was at the home of another relative. Pirated. So I said, great, get the disc and I'll come back to complete this.
To make a long story short, the family member who owns the software talked him into keeping the Norton and convinced him that not only is it the best choice, but that only the software is necessary, no subscription to Norton is actually needed. I tried to convince him otherwise and explain the importance of proper virus protection, especially with constant connectedness of broadband, but it fell on deaf ears and I had to ultimately back off to keep peace in the family.
So my question is, how bad is this going to get? I'm still expected to keep this system running, I just get no control or choice over the virus protection. I know that Comcast is fairly (overly) proactive about diverting rogue stuff from their system, but I feel like this is a very serious open risk and trouble will be quickly forthcoming.
P.S. I forgot to say... the OS is XP, not Vista... so nothing but a personal firewall offered there.