Windows XP Adoption Rates Slow - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Software > Microsoft Windows and Software
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 06-19-2005, 04:50 PM   #1 (permalink)
Techie Beyond Description
 
Osiris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 36,817
Send a message via ICQ to Osiris Send a message via AIM to Osiris Send a message via MSN to Osiris Send a message via Yahoo to Osiris
Default Windows XP Adoption Rates Slow

Although many are eagerly awaiting Microsoft next version of Windows, known as Longhorn, a recent study by AssetMetrix shows that many companies have not even upgraded to Windows XP, a full four years after its release.

The study reports that Windows 2000 is installed on 48 percent of all corporate PCs as of the first quarter of this year, only falling four percent since the last quarter of 2003. In comparison, usage of Windows XP rose from 6.6 to 38 percent during the same period.

The large number of users still on the older operating system poses a problem for Microsoft, who intends to phase out Windows 2000 support at the end of the month.

Even older operating systems from Microsoft are still in use. One in ten computers runs Windows NT, down from 13.5 percent. The biggest drop was recorded in those still running Windows 95 or 98, which fell from 28 percent at the end of 2003 to less than 5 percent this past quarter.
__________________

__________________
Osiris is offline  
Old 06-19-2005, 05:07 PM   #2 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,289
Send a message via AIM to timmer
Default

that is rediculous this shows that microsoft needs to lower there prices for the OS's at 250$ for windows xp pro is quite rediculous i have to say but that is why pirating is at such an alarming rate cause these people are selling there stuff for too much. This is a tip to people who are mad for loosing money due too pirating
__________________

__________________
Intel p4 HT 3.0GHz
1 16x Toshiba dvd burner
2 sticks of corsair ddr2 533mhz 512mb
GeForce Fx 6600GT
Asus P5LD2
HD AUDIO
480W thermaltake
timmer is offline  
Old 06-19-2005, 05:13 PM   #3 (permalink)
Wizard Techie
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,339
Default

In the guid to longhorn thread I already proved why Win2000 is not a good choice and will be abandoned.
__________________
<form action=\"http://www.srsyo.org/tfsearch.php\" method=\"get\">
<input type=\"text\" name=\"search\"> <input type=\"submit\" name=\"submit\" value=\"Search TF before you post!\"></form>
Vista Discussion | 64 Bit Discussion |Microsoft Homepage | Yo Linux | Paul Thurrott | Fire Fox | Thunder Bird | Image Shack | Photo Bucket | Put File | Anti-Spyware | MS Anti-Spyware | Trillian | Anti-Virus | On Line Virus Scan
Tyler1989 is offline  
Old 06-19-2005, 07:03 PM   #4 (permalink)
Member (again)
 
macdude425's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Raul's Wild Kingdom...How 'bout that, huh?
Posts: 4,202
Send a message via AIM to macdude425 Send a message via Yahoo to macdude425
Default

No surprise, really. There are colleges in my area that just now abandoned teaching Windows 2000, and most still have it on at least a couple of servers.
__________________



Debian Support Forums!
macdude425 is offline  
Old 06-19-2005, 07:51 PM   #5 (permalink)
Lord Techie
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 5,280
Send a message via AIM to beedubaya
Default

I think its rediculous that MS is ending support for Win2k. Why would companies want to spend thousands of dollars to upgrade their entire network to XP from 2k when the only real difference between XP and 2000 is that XP has some fancy themes as well as a few extra plug and play options, that mostly benifits the home user. Its a total waste of corporate money to upgrade to XP from 2000 on its workstations.
beedubaya is offline  
Old 06-19-2005, 09:03 PM   #6 (permalink)
Wizard Techie
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,339
Default

Not true. It is a way to promise you get the latestu updates with Win2K being discontinued and it is a way to get the latest software. Longhorn uses .net2.0 something that will not be released to both Win2K or WinXP. Longhorn is the future.
__________________
<form action=\"http://www.srsyo.org/tfsearch.php\" method=\"get\">
<input type=\"text\" name=\"search\"> <input type=\"submit\" name=\"submit\" value=\"Search TF before you post!\"></form>
Vista Discussion | 64 Bit Discussion |Microsoft Homepage | Yo Linux | Paul Thurrott | Fire Fox | Thunder Bird | Image Shack | Photo Bucket | Put File | Anti-Spyware | MS Anti-Spyware | Trillian | Anti-Virus | On Line Virus Scan
Tyler1989 is offline  
Old 06-19-2005, 09:46 PM   #7 (permalink)
Member (again)
 
macdude425's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Raul's Wild Kingdom...How 'bout that, huh?
Posts: 4,202
Send a message via AIM to macdude425 Send a message via Yahoo to macdude425
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyler1989
Longhorn is the future.
Then OS X and Linux are looking really good right now...
__________________



Debian Support Forums!
macdude425 is offline  
Old 06-19-2005, 10:21 PM   #8 (permalink)
True Techie
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 103
Default

Isn't there a large difference in system requirements between XP and 2K while not a lot difference in performance? I use 2K now and I use XP at school; not much difference except that the borders are all fancy with extra effects. For home use, I still think 2K is ideal, at least for those that run 2K already and don't have XP.

Quote:
Originally posted by beedubaya
I think its rediculous that MS is ending support for Win2k. Why would companies want to spend thousands of dollars to upgrade their entire network to XP from 2k when the only real difference between XP and 2000 is that XP has some fancy themes as well as a few extra plug and play options, that mostly benifits the home user. Its a total waste of corporate money to upgrade to XP from 2000 on its workstations.
Right on..
strategist333 is offline  
Old 06-19-2005, 10:42 PM   #9 (permalink)
Member (again)
 
macdude425's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Raul's Wild Kingdom...How 'bout that, huh?
Posts: 4,202
Send a message via AIM to macdude425 Send a message via Yahoo to macdude425
Default

There is a good-sized gap in requirements from 2000 to XP.
Compare for yourself:

http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000...qs/default.asp

-and-

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/p...g/sysreqs.mspx
__________________



Debian Support Forums!
macdude425 is offline  
Old 06-19-2005, 11:12 PM   #10 (permalink)
Wizard Techie
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,339
Default

Doesn't matter Longhorn is the future of Microsoft as it is the only OS that will support .net2.0 to my knowledge as of now. XP may get it in the future but no doubt it isn't getting it anytime soon. Win2K is to be discontinued as I said and not many people are Linux and UNIX guys like ourselves. Many are lost without windows and it is a sad fact. Now that I stated Longhorn is the future the hardware requirements for that are even stricter check out my guide on longhorn it has the hardware requirements.
http://www.techist.com/showthread.ph...8&pagenumber=1
__________________

__________________
<form action=\"http://www.srsyo.org/tfsearch.php\" method=\"get\">
<input type=\"text\" name=\"search\"> <input type=\"submit\" name=\"submit\" value=\"Search TF before you post!\"></form>
Vista Discussion | 64 Bit Discussion |Microsoft Homepage | Yo Linux | Paul Thurrott | Fire Fox | Thunder Bird | Image Shack | Photo Bucket | Put File | Anti-Spyware | MS Anti-Spyware | Trillian | Anti-Virus | On Line Virus Scan
Tyler1989 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.