I have a 2TB internal HDD split in to 4 partitions. XP is running on one, but i want to install windows 7 on another partition or on the same partition. I've tried to lay out my issues and train of thought in as much detail as possible...
Idea/Problem A... I want to easily be able to switch between the 2 from a multiboot menu on start up. However as i understand it, this would only be possible if both operating systems were both installed on the same partition. There is also no option in my bios to specify what partition to boot from as it will only let me chose a physical drive. Therefore as i understand it, it will always boot from the active partition on the hard drive it is booting from. The only way i can see to be able to switch between OS's on the different partitions is to change which partiiton is the active one. But these seems a bit long winded and i cant help but think there must surely be a quicker way to make it work. And as i understand it, unless i logged into a 3rd OS installed on a 2nd separate HDD, in order to switch i would have to remove the active status from the very partition on which the OS i was using to do it was installed which i'm not even sure is possible or advisable. Am i understanding this correctly or are there areas where i am incorrect or any faster work arounds for this?
Idea/Problem B....Alternatively, to avoid this problem, i've considered installing a 2nd OS on the same partition as the 1st. I've done this before with xp home and xp pro for example, even though microsoft reccommend against it and even recall them saying it could not be done somewhere as i recall. Although i never had problems that i'm aware of with it, how advisable is it in reality (unbiased opinion) and what could go wrong? i guess it's possible my system may have perhaps been comprimised somewhat in terms of performance etc when i tried this before without me even knowing it, but i'm not sure to what degree that would be likely. Also is it likely that the fact 2 completely different microsoft OSs are installed on same partition make it more problematic or less (i.e XP and windows 7 as apposed to both just being different versions of XP previously)?
So is it a choice between A and B or is there a more advisable alternative?
Thanks in advance!
Idea/Problem A... I want to easily be able to switch between the 2 from a multiboot menu on start up. However as i understand it, this would only be possible if both operating systems were both installed on the same partition. There is also no option in my bios to specify what partition to boot from as it will only let me chose a physical drive. Therefore as i understand it, it will always boot from the active partition on the hard drive it is booting from. The only way i can see to be able to switch between OS's on the different partitions is to change which partiiton is the active one. But these seems a bit long winded and i cant help but think there must surely be a quicker way to make it work. And as i understand it, unless i logged into a 3rd OS installed on a 2nd separate HDD, in order to switch i would have to remove the active status from the very partition on which the OS i was using to do it was installed which i'm not even sure is possible or advisable. Am i understanding this correctly or are there areas where i am incorrect or any faster work arounds for this?
Idea/Problem B....Alternatively, to avoid this problem, i've considered installing a 2nd OS on the same partition as the 1st. I've done this before with xp home and xp pro for example, even though microsoft reccommend against it and even recall them saying it could not be done somewhere as i recall. Although i never had problems that i'm aware of with it, how advisable is it in reality (unbiased opinion) and what could go wrong? i guess it's possible my system may have perhaps been comprimised somewhat in terms of performance etc when i tried this before without me even knowing it, but i'm not sure to what degree that would be likely. Also is it likely that the fact 2 completely different microsoft OSs are installed on same partition make it more problematic or less (i.e XP and windows 7 as apposed to both just being different versions of XP previously)?
So is it a choice between A and B or is there a more advisable alternative?
Thanks in advance!