plumber4578 In Runtime Messages 392 Location Hanover, PA Feb 21, 2008 #1 I haven't noticed any changes but then yet I really never had any problems with it.
A atomic tofu Fully Optimized Messages 1,585 Feb 21, 2008 #2 mess around with some of the file copying...that's what irked many I believe, lol... and maybe the defragger if you used the Vista one
mess around with some of the file copying...that's what irked many I believe, lol... and maybe the defragger if you used the Vista one
OP OP plumber4578 In Runtime Messages 392 Location Hanover, PA Feb 21, 2008 #3 I'll have to check out the defragger. I 4got about that mess. I never really expect much though with a windows defragger. They all suck and probably always will.
I'll have to check out the defragger. I 4got about that mess. I never really expect much though with a windows defragger. They all suck and probably always will.
KSoD Call me Mak or K, Mod Emeritus Messages 35,644 Location C:\ Feb 21, 2008 #4 I have the 32 Bit version already installed. It does improve Vista. but i still prefer Server 2008...
I have the 32 Bit version already installed. It does improve Vista. but i still prefer Server 2008...
S servo.tsc In Runtime Messages 111 Feb 21, 2008 #5 I loaded it on a 64bit version and it greatly improved the startup speed.