DVD + or -

Status
Not open for further replies.

zildjianchris

In Runtime
Messages
157
Sorry if this is in the wrong place, but couldn't think of any where better. My friend is after dvd/rw, but trying to figure out whether to get + or -, what exactly is that difference.
Thanks
Chris
 
just get a dual format so you dont have to worry. Most dvd players work with - but some need +. Whichever one you get I promise your player will not like it. The plextor is one of the best dual format dual layer burners. see my sig
 
Oh damn, sorry about that, I just read what I said. I meant he is after blank dvd's. Not the drive. Any help, thanks.
Chris
 
- is the most versitle but make sure his burner is - compatable. Also good idea to test if you are going to use with a dvd player to see what type it likes.
 
Yeah, I know for a fact they're going to be using the dvd's on a dvd player. But yeah, not sure exactly what to do.
 
+ and - is basically where the data is allocated. Some DVD players WILL NOT READ + or - and you need to get the right one. I know for a fact my Pioneer 104 DVD-RW will only accept - media. It's pretty much a game of experimentation but I find Memorex to be a good company for - media types.
 
if you get a burner that does bitsetting and then get + media you will have no problems at all.

the bitsetting makes it a dvd-rom type which makes for better compatibilty.
 
ZeroX said:
if you get a burner that does bitsetting and then get + media you will have no problems at all.

the bitsetting makes it a dvd-rom type which makes for better compatibilty.


so true.

there use to be an argument that - R was more compatible. that was true 3 years ago. not anymore. if you have a dvd player that won't accept a udf 1.02 (dvd-rom, which is backward compatible with dvd video) +r, then it's is old as hell.

some (few) dvd players won't accept udf 1.50 (dvd video) +r's discs, but they are the minority

you can't go wrong buying either disc, but +r is better for computer use like packet writing and mount rainer (udf 2.00 and udf 2.01)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom