A question about the difference between a P4, a Celeron and an AMD processor. - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > Monitors, Printers and Peripherals
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 01-17-2004, 09:49 PM   #1 (permalink)
Junior Techie
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 52
Default A question about the difference between a P4, a Celeron and an AMD processor.

Ok, I am looking to build a system and I am slightly confused about some of the systems I'm seeing. For instance, I found a Intel Celeron 2.6ghz for 250$ and a Pentium 4 2.5gz for 325$. They are by the same seller and the same company so my question is this, what's the difference. The Celeron is cheaper and faster, any ideas as to why? Also I've seen this with AMD proccesor's as well, where they are more expensive and have less hertz. Thanks!
__________________

Blackecho is offline  
Old 01-17-2004, 10:18 PM   #2 (permalink)
Junior Techie
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 52
Default

another thing i noticed. i recently read that a mac g5 is one of the most powerful home computers too date, but when I searched it on google it only had 2.2ghz. and the one of the newer athlon processors has only 2.3ghz. are hertz as important as i think, or does something else make the computer?
__________________

Blackecho is offline  
Old 01-18-2004, 04:37 AM   #3 (permalink)
Wizard Techie
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,937
Default

celeron are comparable to duron. they have less L1 or L2 cache and perform terrible. pentium4 are comparable to XP line of processors. xp are much cheaper and their design is superior. plus you can easily overclock an XP processor, making the comparision even more uneven. CPU frequency alone doesn't tell you how powerful it is.

my personal opinion, there is no point in comparing a pc to mac. their hardware is very different and software availability is scarce for mac compared to availability for pc. mac processors are not superior. i think that is a bunch of lies, straight up.

mac OSX operating system is a toy compared to windows XP excluding the server versions. it is also overhyped as being good for graphics work.
ekÆsine is offline  
Old 01-18-2004, 08:28 AM   #4 (permalink)
Junior Techie
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 58
Send a message via AIM to Marshall
Default

as Ek said above, the frequancy of a CPU isn't the only thing that counts,

if you want to build a profession PC , then drop all Celeron PCU's; there not crap, but don't quite the work u expect from them,

you can't really go wrong with a Pentium or AMD CPU, both very good, the only differance is the hardware you can use with both of them,
__________________
One Life, One Love, One United
Marshall is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.