PCGamer bashes ATI - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > Monitors, Printers and Peripherals
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 05-10-2002, 01:48 AM   #1 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Posts: 1,422
Angry PCGamer bashes ATI

I was reading a quick copy of PC Gamer yesterday, and while flipping through it they had an NVIDIA vs ATI comparison. Basically here's how they "broke it down" with price and ratings.

Ti4600 - 400$ - 91%
Ti4400 - 300$ - 92%
TI4200 - 160$ - 94%

8500 128 meg retail - 300$ - 77%
8500 128 meg LE - 200$ - 79%

Basically they stated an R8500 was an inferior performer, and that you could get a GF4 Ti 4200 or 4400 for cheaper or slightly more and get way better performance.

What I don't get though is why they would compare NVIDIA's latest generation product to ATI's 6-month-old chip, which was originally in direct competition with NVIDIA's GeForce3 line of cards produced a year ago.

http://home.nyc.rr.com/rieper/images/pcgamer1.JPG

http://home.nyc.rr.com/rieper/images/pcgamer2.JPG
__________________

__________________
Martin's Page of Stuff

I judge you when you use poor grammar.
Martin is offline  
Old 05-10-2002, 01:48 AM   #2 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Posts: 1,422
Angry PCGamer bashes ATI

I was reading a quick copy of PC Gamer yesterday, and while flipping through it they had an NVIDIA vs ATI comparison. Basically here's how they "broke it down" with price and ratings.

Ti4600 - 400$ - 91%
Ti4400 - 300$ - 92%
TI4200 - 160$ - 94%

8500 128 meg retail - 300$ - 77%
8500 128 meg LE - 200$ - 79%

Basically they stated an R8500 was an inferior performer, and that you could get a GF4 Ti 4200 or 4400 for cheaper or slightly more and get way better performance.

What I don't get though is why they would compare NVIDIA's latest generation product to ATI's 6-month-old chip, which was originally in direct competition with NVIDIA's GeForce3 line of cards produced a year ago.

http://home.nyc.rr.com/rieper/images/pcgamer1.JPG

http://home.nyc.rr.com/rieper/images/pcgamer2.JPG
__________________

__________________
Martin's Page of Stuff

I judge you when you use poor grammar.
Martin is offline  
Old 03-21-2004, 06:47 PM   #3 (permalink)
Wizard Techie
 
Jorsoft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oakdale, MN
Posts: 4,581
Default

I have that same issue. ATI released the 8500 cards to compete with GF3, yes, but because their new technology was not yet ready to compete with Nvidia's new Geforce 4, they kind of "re-released" those cards with different names (XT and LE, I believe). The core technology itself was still 6 months old, however, so PC Gamer was just doing it's job to compare these cards and help consumers make an informed decision. Currently, though, ATI cards give better performance and compatibility than Nvidia's latest.
__________________
Jorsoft is offline  
Old 03-21-2004, 07:39 PM   #4 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,432
Default

Isn't the Ti4600 abit old aswell......
__________________

<marquee scrollamount=4 bgcolor=\"#000000\">Desktop: 3.0ghz HT 800fsb P4, Chaintech 9CJS Zenith, 2x 512mb GEIL Dual Channel DDR400, 80gb 7200rpm ATA HD, Sapphire X800 XT Platinum Edition, Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS, Logitech Z-5300e 5.1 THX Speakers, Turbolink 420watt PSU, Black 19\" Orion Monitor, Logitech MX Duo and Win XP Home</marquee>
<marquee scrollamount=4 bgcolor=\"#000000\">My Wishlist: 74gb 10K SATA Western Digital Raptor...</marquee>
The Merlin is offline  
Old 03-21-2004, 09:47 PM   #5 (permalink)
Ultra Techie
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 548
Send a message via AIM to aye29 Send a message via Yahoo to aye29
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by The Merlin
Isn't the Ti4600 abit old aswell......
That issue came out a long time ago well before the Radoen 9700 was available when the Ti4600 was still pretty new.
aye29 is offline  
Old 03-21-2004, 10:23 PM   #6 (permalink)
Imperial Space Womble
 
Harper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 6,903
Default Re: PCGamer bashes ATI

Quote:
Originally posted by Martin
What I don't get though is why they would compare NVIDIA's latest generation product to ATI's 6-month-old chip, which was originally in direct competition with NVIDIA's GeForce3 line of cards produced a year ago.
Although I am a Pro-nVidia person myself, I do find that it's biased that some one would compair prices on a current chipset vs a older chipset.

As I tell customers from time to time, "Compare apples with apples please, and stop B.S.ing me around."

We are talking about a current issue here of PC Gamer, right?
__________________

"I FEEL SO GOOD I FEEL SO NUMB, YEAH!!!" -- Rob Zombie
Main Rig - AMD FX-8350x8 4.0Ghz CPU, 4x 8Gb (32Gb) DDR3 Ram, Gigabyte GA-970A-D3, GeForce GT 970 4Gb, 1x 256Gb SSD\8Tb (3+2+2+1) SATA HDD, DVDRW, SB X-Fi, Win 10 (64-bit)
Asus N61JV-JX231V - Intel Core i5 3437u (1.9 - 2.4 GHz), 12GB, 640GB, 16" Display, nVidia 325M 1Gb, DVD-RW, Win 10 (64-bit)
Mobile Phone : Samsung Galaxy 5 Note SM-N920IConsole : Play Station 4
Harper is offline  
Old 03-21-2004, 10:40 PM   #7 (permalink)
Super Techie
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 405
Send a message via AIM to mousepad
Default

If so tell me what page, I want to look at it.
__________________
me: in fact the san diego\'s pretty much hit the very top on games
friend: yeah
friend: its all the illegal labor


Computer Specs
HP Presario R4025US NoteBook
Athlon 64 AMD3200+ .... 15.4\" WXGA
1GB DDR .... 80GB + 120 GB External
DVD¬ĪR/RW .... ATI RADEON Xpress 200M
mousepad is offline  
Old 03-21-2004, 11:14 PM   #8 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Posts: 1,422
Default

Gee, looks like someone managed to bump up one of my old threads from almost two years ago.

Anyways, as I later found out, the Radeon 8500 and GeForce4 Ti 4200 are both DirectX 8.1 cards, but I still couldn't overlook why they failed to look at other important features in the long run. I still find it to be more technically advanced than the GeForce4, but I don't quite remember if driver issues were put into the equation.
__________________
Martin's Page of Stuff

I judge you when you use poor grammar.
Martin is offline  
Old 03-21-2004, 11:18 PM   #9 (permalink)
Super Techie
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 424
Send a message via AIM to Erik Send a message via Yahoo to Erik
Default

Appearently the Ti4600 is a decent card because it's still well over the $100 mark on newegg.
__________________

Erik is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.