P4- 4GHz Cancelled - Page 3 - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > Monitors, Printers and Peripherals
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 07-08-2005, 01:01 PM   #21 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
majistic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,434
Default

Man, Uzi you just aren't understanding what I am saying...I know what I am talking about...
__________________

__________________
majistic is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 01:25 PM   #22 (permalink)
Super Techie
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 496
Default

Heyyo,

There's no point really for Intel to hit that 4GHz limit. AMD could easily beat them out with the already impressive FX-57. Heck, the FX-57 isin't even near 4GHz. So AMD could uber-slaughter Intel on single core. They knew this, so inna smart move they focused on dual core. I wasn't so much about fan respect, it was about wroking on getting out the best cpu they can, and their isin't any big improvements left on single core anymore anyways people.

So I say intel did a smart move. Plus, have you guys seen the pricetag on the FX-57? now think of the P4 at 4GHz. yeah. I'd probably be cheaper to get the new mobo that supports dual core and a dual core cpu than get the FX-57 or the P4 GHz (if it existed).
__________________

__________________
Later-A-Much, and LONG LIVE THE D!
æ ThE_MarÐ
ThE_MarD is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 01:29 PM   #23 (permalink)
Build Guru
 
PP Mguire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 28,317
Default

the p4 wouldnt be able to touch the fx-57 w/ a 10ft pole though so in a sence your right. But it just sounds liek intel is trying to gip AMDs design more and more. saying they are going to the "mobile" design just means hey were trying to be sneaky and try to copy AMD.
__________________
"Resolution is just a number." #Ubisoft
Origin/Steam = PP_Mguire Twitch = pp_mguire Instagram = ppmguire PSN = PP_Mguire

Access to my Plex PM me.
PP Mguire is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 01:34 PM   #24 (permalink)
Master Techie
 
uzi9mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Horseheads, NY
Posts: 2,553
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by majistic
Man, Uzi you just aren't understanding what I am saying...I know what I am talking about...

What are you trying to say then?
__________________
INTEL i7 930
ASUS P6X58D
3x2gb Corsair Dominators
EVGA GTX 480
CORSAIR 850-HX
uzi9mm is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 01:39 PM   #25 (permalink)
Super Techie
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 330
Send a message via AIM to dumdum8684
Default

if i understand him right majistic was basing that on the article that he posted. He didn't realize that it had come out in Oct 2004 so he thought it was new and dual-proc hadn't come out yet...
__________________

My Computer:
-UV Reactive Acrylic Mid-Size Case
-Thermaltake 420W
-AMD Athlon XP \"Barton\" 3200+ 400MHz
-Cooler Master Aero7+
-Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe Mobo
-nVidia GeForce FX 5700 128MB
-2x Kingston HyperX 512MB PC3200
-2x 200GB WD 7200 8MB SATA
-2x 12\" UV Cold Cathodes
-5x 80MM 4UV LED Blue UV-Reactive Fans


My Laptop:
P3 750MHz, 512MB, CD-RW/DVD Combo, 15.1\" TFT, 20GB HD, 32MB integrated video
dumdum8684 is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 02:48 PM   #26 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
majistic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,434
Default

No no, I knew dual-procs had came out. I never followed Pentiums. (i've always been an AMD fanboy) So I didn't know that Pentium had a dual proc out..but still I agree with Mguire and MarD say, Intel is going to need to come up with some uber quick and great to get near the FX-57.
__________________
majistic is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 03:14 PM   #27 (permalink)
Master Techie
 
uzi9mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Horseheads, NY
Posts: 2,553
Default

Intel is trashing the NetBurst architecture, because Pentium M's OC'd can beat a FX-55. They are mobile processors and they are designed to run as cool as possible. But if you use the Pentium M in accordance with a full size desktop HSF, you should be able to get a great Overclock.

Intel is getting their act together. So 2-3 years down the road the tables might turn.
__________________
INTEL i7 930
ASUS P6X58D
3x2gb Corsair Dominators
EVGA GTX 480
CORSAIR 850-HX
uzi9mm is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 03:20 PM   #28 (permalink)
Lord Techie
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,013
Send a message via AIM to DJ-CHRIS
Default

My new sig pertains to intel basicly re-releasing the pentium 3
DJ-CHRIS is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 03:23 PM   #29 (permalink)
Wizard Techie
 
HAVOC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Milford, Connecticut
Posts: 4,218
Send a message via AIM to HAVOC Send a message via Yahoo to HAVOC
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by DJ-CHRIS
My new sig pertains to intel basicly re-releasing the pentium 3
DJ-CHRIS Spell Check: December

And the reason they have cancelled the 4.0Ghz development is because they've found that if you put a frying pan on-top of the CPU, you can cook a steak better then a George Forman...

It's just too damn power hungry...
HAVOC is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 03:26 PM   #30 (permalink)
Lord Techie
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,013
Send a message via AIM to DJ-CHRIS
Default

Thanks for helping not make an !d!0t of myself

Spelt knowledge wrong in a title, and the title was knowledge = power
__________________

DJ-CHRIS is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.