New gtx260 core 216 (stock) compared to a 9600gt ssc - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > Monitors, Printers and Peripherals
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 01-22-2009, 09:36 AM   #1 (permalink)
Lord Techie
 
Luke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fonthill, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,601
Send a message via AIM to Luke Send a message via MSN to Luke
Default New gtx260 core 216 (stock) compared to a 9600gt ssc

It finally arrived after a 2 week delay, which really ****ed me off. Just messing around with it last night proved that it is a beast, crysis on max at 1680x1050 and easily playable, i did not check the fps as i was study for exams, be tonight i will run it through some of the latest games and post the fps, and what i got with me old 9600gt ssc. i would run it there 3dmark but i don't have it and have dialup.

Im at school right now, so i'll do it when i get home.
__________________

__________________
3770K @ 4.7 Ghz H100 Water Cooled | GTX 970 MSI Gold Edition SLI
32GB G.Skill RipJaws (Rendering/ Virtualization) | Corsair 650D | CORSAIR RM1000W w/ White Cable KIt
Samsung 850 Pro 256 GB SSD Boot | OCZ Vertex 3 240GB SSD Secondary | WD Black 1 TB | WD Green 3 TB
Server: Core i7 920 | 8GB RAM | Intel 240gb 730 SSD Boot | 3 x 2TB WD RED | Fractal R4
Luke is offline  
Old 01-22-2009, 10:19 AM   #2 (permalink)
 
patonb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In Gov't Regulated Cubical
Posts: 9,745
Default Re: New gtx260 core 216 (stock) compared to a 9600gt ssc

and now you can fold on it.. it'll do 5-7500ppd.
__________________

__________________
Foldie = i5 6600kMSI Z170A M5 EVGA 970 SC Corsair H100 Corsair hx520 2x8gb GSkill Corsair 650D
Woohoo = L5639 @3.1Ghz EVGA SR-2 gtx 260-216 Hyper 212+ Corsair 1050hx 6x2gb Corsair XMS3 Blackhawk Ulra
Alienware 18 - SLI 770M 4700mq 16Gig

patonb is offline  
Old 01-22-2009, 11:45 AM   #3 (permalink)
Lord Techie
 
Luke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fonthill, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,601
Send a message via AIM to Luke Send a message via MSN to Luke
Default Re: New gtx260 core 216 (stock) compared to a 9600gt ssc

^afraid not, i tried and tried and couldn't get the **** smp running, plus dial up really limits it. and i already have a **** load of stuff running, another computer running would put the power bill too high for my folks

couldn't get the gpu client running either.
__________________
3770K @ 4.7 Ghz H100 Water Cooled | GTX 970 MSI Gold Edition SLI
32GB G.Skill RipJaws (Rendering/ Virtualization) | Corsair 650D | CORSAIR RM1000W w/ White Cable KIt
Samsung 850 Pro 256 GB SSD Boot | OCZ Vertex 3 240GB SSD Secondary | WD Black 1 TB | WD Green 3 TB
Server: Core i7 920 | 8GB RAM | Intel 240gb 730 SSD Boot | 3 x 2TB WD RED | Fractal R4
Luke is offline  
Old 01-22-2009, 12:35 PM   #4 (permalink)
 
patonb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In Gov't Regulated Cubical
Posts: 9,745
Default Re: New gtx260 core 216 (stock) compared to a 9600gt ssc

The gpu is easy now they slowed down work, but yha, D/U will suck for WU sending.
__________________
Foldie = i5 6600kMSI Z170A M5 EVGA 970 SC Corsair H100 Corsair hx520 2x8gb GSkill Corsair 650D
Woohoo = L5639 @3.1Ghz EVGA SR-2 gtx 260-216 Hyper 212+ Corsair 1050hx 6x2gb Corsair XMS3 Blackhawk Ulra
Alienware 18 - SLI 770M 4700mq 16Gig

patonb is offline  
Old 01-22-2009, 12:43 PM   #5 (permalink)
Lord Techie
 
ricanflow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Euless, Tx
Posts: 6,317
Default Re: New gtx260 core 216 (stock) compared to a 9600gt ssc

I dont see how youve had so many issues...the gpu client is so easy to install and run.

dont even bother with smp.
__________________
3DMARK06 = 20,341 (3.8GHZ)



Laptop
P7350 | GTX 260M | 4GB DDR2 800 | 320GB HD | X-Fi | Vista 64

Folding Rig/File Server

M775 | E1200 | Foxconn P9657AB
| Dual 8800GT | Antec NeoHE 500 | Barracuda 80GB | Wintec Ampx



ricanflow is offline  
Old 01-22-2009, 01:39 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
patonb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In Gov't Regulated Cubical
Posts: 9,745
Default Re: New gtx260 core 216 (stock) compared to a 9600gt ssc

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricanflow View Post
I dont see how youve had so many issues...the gpu client is so easy to install and run.

dont even bother with smp.

Man, the smp is an easy 2800ppd........ If i don't lock up.... How do people manage farms of them, is beyond me!
__________________
Foldie = i5 6600kMSI Z170A M5 EVGA 970 SC Corsair H100 Corsair hx520 2x8gb GSkill Corsair 650D
Woohoo = L5639 @3.1Ghz EVGA SR-2 gtx 260-216 Hyper 212+ Corsair 1050hx 6x2gb Corsair XMS3 Blackhawk Ulra
Alienware 18 - SLI 770M 4700mq 16Gig

patonb is offline  
Old 01-22-2009, 03:26 PM   #7 (permalink)
Lord Techie
 
ricanflow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Euless, Tx
Posts: 6,317
Default Re: New gtx260 core 216 (stock) compared to a 9600gt ssc

core i7's clocked at 4ghz get like 10,000 ppd.
__________________
3DMARK06 = 20,341 (3.8GHZ)



Laptop
P7350 | GTX 260M | 4GB DDR2 800 | 320GB HD | X-Fi | Vista 64

Folding Rig/File Server

M775 | E1200 | Foxconn P9657AB
| Dual 8800GT | Antec NeoHE 500 | Barracuda 80GB | Wintec Ampx



ricanflow is offline  
Old 01-22-2009, 04:22 PM   #8 (permalink)
Lord Techie
 
Luke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fonthill, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,601
Send a message via AIM to Luke Send a message via MSN to Luke
Default Re: New gtx260 core 216 (stock) compared to a 9600gt ssc

Quote:
I dont see how youve had so many issues...the gpu client is so easy to install and run.
i downloaded, installed it , and it would not run, nothing happened.

anyway, the thread isn't about that.

Here's what i got with my 9600gt, i'll add the core 216 stuff in about half an hour when i finish it.

---------------
Stock Galaxy 9600gt ssc (running at 1680x1050)
The FPS were taken with FRAPS, yeah i know it's not too accurate but it's close enough, also i took the fps while in the heat of things, not just standing there doing nothing.

Stock Evga 55nm GTX 260 Core 216 (no overclocking)
---------------

COD4-

(Didn't record the specs it was on at the time but around medium, i might add them later)

35-55FPS -9600GT
65-73FPS -GTX 260 CORE 216

--------------

CRYSIS WARHEAD-


no AA
Everything set at mainstream except for:
Objects-High

32-40FPS -9600GT
55-60FPS -GTX 260 CORE 216

----------------

GRAW 2 (Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter 2)

Max Settings
4xAA
Basic Physx for 9600gt, full extreme physx for CORE 216 (9600gt does not support full physx)

47-60FPS -9600GT

65-80FPS -GTX 260 CORE 216

-------------------

FALLOUT 3

NO AA
NO AF
DETAIL: medium
Im not going to go into detail about the rest as there is a lot of settings, but they are all about medium.

55-60FPS -9600GT
60-64FPS -GTX 260 CORE 216

---------------------

FARCRY 2

NO AA
REAL TREE: HIGH
FIRE: MEDIUM
PHYSICS: VERY HIGH
VEGETATION: VERY HIGH
SHADING: VERY HIGH
GEOMETRY: VERY HIGH
POST: MEDIUM
TEXTURES: HIGH
SHADOW: HIGH
AMBIENT: MEDIUM

35-40FPS -9600GT
54-65FP -GTX 260 CORE 216

--------------------

WORLD IN CONFLICT

NO AA
NO AF
PIXEL SHADERS: HIGH
PHYSICS: HIGH
TEXTURE: HIGH
TERRAIN TEXTURE: HIGH
WATER:HIGH
SHADOWS: ON
WORLD DISTANCE DETAIL: HIGH
WINDOWS ON BUILDINGS: ON
EXTRA OBJECT DETAIL: ON
UNIT TRACKS: ON
GROUND SCORCH MARKS: ON

48-53FPS -9600GT
71-90FPS -GTX 260 CORE 216

------------------------------------------------------------

AS you can see fallout 3 did not increase much. The rest of them increased quite a lot.
__________________
3770K @ 4.7 Ghz H100 Water Cooled | GTX 970 MSI Gold Edition SLI
32GB G.Skill RipJaws (Rendering/ Virtualization) | Corsair 650D | CORSAIR RM1000W w/ White Cable KIt
Samsung 850 Pro 256 GB SSD Boot | OCZ Vertex 3 240GB SSD Secondary | WD Black 1 TB | WD Green 3 TB
Server: Core i7 920 | 8GB RAM | Intel 240gb 730 SSD Boot | 3 x 2TB WD RED | Fractal R4
Luke is offline  
Old 01-22-2009, 05:18 PM   #9 (permalink)
 
zedman3d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,852
Default Re: New gtx260 core 216 (stock) compared to a 9600gt ssc

Thanx for the benchies.
zedman3d is offline  
Old 01-22-2009, 07:05 PM   #10 (permalink)
Lord Techie
 
ricanflow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Euless, Tx
Posts: 6,317
Default Re: New gtx260 core 216 (stock) compared to a 9600gt ssc

Good benches dude.

Just how long did you let it run though?? since youre on dialup it takes a while to download the work...after that itll start to fold and then you need to leave it open so it can send back the results.

If you leave it on for a few hours i bet it will send at least one unit.

any folding will help the team..we are already ranked 180 and can make it to 100 if we keep at it.
__________________

__________________
3DMARK06 = 20,341 (3.8GHZ)



Laptop
P7350 | GTX 260M | 4GB DDR2 800 | 320GB HD | X-Fi | Vista 64

Folding Rig/File Server

M775 | E1200 | Foxconn P9657AB
| Dual 8800GT | Antec NeoHE 500 | Barracuda 80GB | Wintec Ampx



ricanflow is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GTX 260 Core 216 vs. Hd 4870 1GB Mikepsyche New Systems | Building and Buying 91 01-14-2009 01:59 AM
55nm vs 65nm core 216 Nagasama New Systems | Building and Buying 46 01-09-2009 04:04 PM
Core clock lower than stock... StealthTools Overclocking and Modding 8 12-24-2008 05:44 PM
** Selling EVGA gtx 260, not core 216 ** Jtumble2 Buy/Sell/Trade and Hot Deals 1 12-05-2008 02:49 AM
GTX 260 core 216 worth it to upgrade? 8800 GTX comparison Gabb New Systems | Building and Buying 86 12-04-2008 09:09 AM



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.