tomshardware sucks balls? Why exactly does it suck balls? Please explain your opinion as may-be I might understand it better.
They review hardware - testing, benchmarking, write articles. How can they suck balls?
Do you mean they don't know what the hell they are talking about? Don't know how to test? website layout if bad? Editorials suck? Do you think they are biased?
I like your input on things nubius, i'd love to hear this one. - Compliment
Gaara did a pretty good explination......it's simply because they use a lot of the same setups when testing different things.......IE, I believe they will ALWAYS use corsair RAM which is lame.....and when OC'ing a board they'll say it's the boards problem when they are using crap RAM......beyond that.......they seem as if they are so racked to write reviews......they'll tinker with a board, graphics card, what have you for an hour and they write a review basically saying they've thoroughly investigated it......
For the most part however, I don't trust most reviewers because of the same reasons of tinkering with hardware slightly and writing this review as if they've done every test known to man.......user reviews are always the best, and generally the best are from xtremesystems
Gaara did pretty much nail everything else on the head though........some places are practically paid by certain companies to say good things, hardocp I believe it is, is HEAVILY biased towards nvidia and basically no matter what will give them the better word over ATI even if its blatently not true....
ESPECIALLY from the last few benchmarking 'reviews' from tomshardware, it's just absolute crap and then noobs come in here saying LOOK A 9200PRO BEATS OUT A 6800GT because they were using old *** hardware and/or drivers.