Intel ships 64-bit, 1MB L2 Pentium 4s - Page 3 - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > Monitors, Printers and Peripherals
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 06-14-2005, 01:26 PM   #21 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,487
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by woot6600GT
Pentium M??? I thought those sucked ***? Like a Celly?
Pentium M's own, where have you been?
__________________

__________________
<font size=\"1\">Intel Pentium 4 3.4GHZ HT-------------------AMD Athlon 64 3000+ Winchester
Intel Stock CPU Cooler------------------------Zalman 7700-Cu
Idle: 51C---------------------------------------Idle: 21C
Load: 72C--------------------------------------Load: 28C
ASUS P4C800-E Deluxe-----------------------GIGABYTE K8NF4-9 NForce4 4X
512MBX2 Corsair XMS 2-2-2-5 PC-3200-----512MBX2 Corsair XMS 2-2-2-5 PC-3200
ATI RADEON X800 XT Platinum Edition-------ATI RADEON X800 XL
Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS----------Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS
Western Digital Raptor 37GB 10K------------2X Western Digital SATA150 Caviar SE 80GB RAID 0
Antec True 480W------------------------------Thermaltake Silent PurePower 680W
Zalman 5.1 Headphones----------------------Zalman 5.1 Headphones
Zalman High Sensitivity Microphone----------Zalman High Sensitivity Microphone
Microsoft Multimedia Keyboard 1.0A----------Logitech Media Keyboard
Microsoft Intellimouse Explorer 4.0A---------Logitech MX510
3DMark05: 5,928------------------------------3DMark05: 5,000</font>
dale5605 is offline  
Old 06-14-2005, 01:36 PM   #22 (permalink)
I Rule You
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 543
Send a message via AIM to FadingTheory Send a message via Yahoo to FadingTheory
Default

Quote:
Intel's new naming scheme is awful, first thing I have to say.
The naming scheme is pretty bad.... but its not HARD to learn.

Quote:
I wouldn't consider this much of an accomplishment, they cut the cache in half, I don't see why the hell they are going backwards

Newcastle.
__________________

__________________
Iraq... whee.
FadingTheory is offline  
Old 06-14-2005, 02:30 PM   #23 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,261
Default

So, Pentium M's are good... wtf, my whole world is collapsing on me. Better than P4?
woot7800GT is offline  
Old 06-14-2005, 02:59 PM   #24 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
idiotec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,748
Default

Quote:
So, Pentium M's are good... wtf, my whole world is collapsing on me. Better than P4?
Clock for clock they are way better. There are not a whole lot of desktop solutions for the M yet, but DFI has a board, and Asus as an adapter.

A Pentium M at 2.5Ghz, beat the fx-55 in most benchs.

That is why I said before it will be best to wait until next year to pick up a new chip. Intel is basing there new line on the M core, and should be a big improvement for them. We could see Intel really compete again in the gaming arena.
__________________

BE HEARD - Techonvent
DS3 | E6400 - 3.2GHz 24/7 | 2GB OCZ PLat. PC6400 | 6800GT | Zippy 460W
What the world needs is more geniuses with humility, there are so few of us left.
idiotec is offline  
Old 06-14-2005, 03:03 PM   #25 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,261
Default

Jeez, I had no idea...
woot7800GT is offline  
Old 06-14-2005, 04:28 PM   #26 (permalink)
Wizard Techie
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,790
Default

Quote:
Newcastle.
The newcastle and clawhammer/sledgehammer cores came out at about the same time. All I'm saying is I don't see why the hell this matters as there's no change in architechture and they're no different between their bigger brothers apart from a smaller cache. All this looks like to me is Intel trying to cheapen an already expensive platform while cutting out their cache size performance edge at the same time which defeats the purpose.

Quote:
because a pentium M matches a FX 55 in performance when OC'd. But you have to remember that these are mobile chips, they are supposed to run cool and efficent. But it you add a full size HSF, your going to be able to OC it like a mofo.
What does that have to do with anything I said?

A 3000+ can match an FX-55 if overclocked too ya know...
__________________
Intel C2D E6320 / AMD Athlon X2 3800+
Gigabyte 965P DS3 / DFI nF4 Ultra-D
2GB OCZ Gold PC2-6400 / 2GB OCZ Gold PC4000
eVGA 8800GTS 320MB / eVGA 6800GS 256MB
150GB Raptor / 74GB Raptor
2x500GB / 320GB
OCZ GameXStreme 850w / OCZ StealthXStream 600w
gaara is offline  
Old 06-14-2005, 04:44 PM   #27 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,286
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by horndude
Whats the hurry pc-boy, you still dont have an OS to use with it,not a mainstream one anyway,winblows64 may be out but it should be considered beta from what Ive seen of it.
but if intel got their 64-bit as early as AMD, Microsoft and the other software companies would already have gotten a head start on 64-bit... right now we would be set... Intel slowed everything down...

btw, their earlier 64-bit was kid of like a "beta" chip, they just made it so they could have one, it wasn't meant for mass production
__________________
Samsung QX410 notebook <-- lol, I'm always on the go these days :(
pc_boy is offline  
Old 06-14-2005, 05:56 PM   #28 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
idiotec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,748
Default

Quote:
A 3000+ can match an FX-55 if overclocked too ya know...
Yeah, but we are talking about a lowly Intel here. Isn't that more impressive?
__________________

BE HEARD - Techonvent
DS3 | E6400 - 3.2GHz 24/7 | 2GB OCZ PLat. PC6400 | 6800GT | Zippy 460W
What the world needs is more geniuses with humility, there are so few of us left.
idiotec is offline  
Old 06-15-2005, 04:51 PM   #29 (permalink)
Master Techie
 
uzi9mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Horseheads, NY
Posts: 2,553
Default

Yeah you probably can OC a 3000+ to match a fx-55 but you probably need like water cooling or some sh!t like that

The pentium M only needs like a regular HSF
__________________
INTEL i7 930
ASUS P6X58D
3x2gb Corsair Dominators
EVGA GTX 480
CORSAIR 850-HX
uzi9mm is offline  
Old 06-15-2005, 05:18 PM   #30 (permalink)
Wizard Techie
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,790
Default

Done with a bit of aftermarket cooling, I read a review on it a couple days ago actually and the 3000+ was reaching the FX-55 speeds easily.

An 800MHz increase on a Venice isn't really anything out of the ordinary without ridiculous cooling.
__________________

__________________
Intel C2D E6320 / AMD Athlon X2 3800+
Gigabyte 965P DS3 / DFI nF4 Ultra-D
2GB OCZ Gold PC2-6400 / 2GB OCZ Gold PC4000
eVGA 8800GTS 320MB / eVGA 6800GS 256MB
150GB Raptor / 74GB Raptor
2x500GB / 320GB
OCZ GameXStreme 850w / OCZ StealthXStream 600w
gaara is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.