how do you read AMD Athlon speeds? - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > Monitors, Printers and Peripherals
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-27-2005, 10:28 PM   #1 (permalink)
Newb Techie
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 35
Send a message via AIM to drindahowse
Default how do you read AMD Athlon speeds?

well im kind of confused. I know that you read Pentium 4 speeds like 2.8GHz, 3.0GHz, 3.2GHz, 3.4GHz and so on....

But with AMD Athlon you read it as 2200+, 2800+, 3200+, 3400+, and so on....

so my question is how do you compare the same speed to each other, for example:
what does 3200+ equal in Pentium terms?
does 3200+ equal 3.2GHz??

someone please answer!

drindahowse is offline  
Old 06-27-2005, 10:32 PM   #2 (permalink)
Wizard Techie
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,312

most of the time, yes. however it also depends on the core. for example, the 3700+ san diego is better than the 3800+ venice.

so, umm, err yeah
003 is offline  
Old 06-27-2005, 10:33 PM   #3 (permalink)
Ultra Techie
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 862
Send a message via AIM to Megadeth2 Send a message via Yahoo to Megadeth2

Pretty much that is how its done. Oh you should know that 2800+ is rated to perform better than a 2.8 GHz P4, not equally. That goes for all Athlon 64s. The Athlon XPs is a different story, since the architecture is older it doesn't hold up well against the new P4s as it used to and they are being fazed out of the market anyway. So, stick with the Athlon 64 and yes, the corresponding rating shows that it will perform than the corresponding Intel part at that speed in that same market sector (value, performance, extreme).
Megadeth2 is offline  
Old 06-27-2005, 10:35 PM   #4 (permalink)
Wizard Techie
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,790

Please search, this has been covered numerous times.

AMD clock cylcles can process more instructions than Intel clock cycles and gradual grow more and more effective with each generation. Therefore an AMD processor can use a smaller frequency than Intel yet still process the same amount at the same speed.

To put it simply this is because AMD uses shorter pipelines, which provides performance in "horsepower" applications, or more specifically, games. AMD can send more data out faster with each clock cycle, but not as much.

Intel on the other hand uses long pipelines. They excel in rendering, encoding, and other extensive CPU intensive applications. Intel takes a lot of data at once and processes it over an extended period of time, or takes more clock cycles.

The AMD naming scheme was introduced to give users a comparison between their chips, and those of Intel. In theory an Athlon 3200+ is the competitor of the 3.2GHz Intel Pentium 4, however due to their differences in architechture as mentioned above each excel in a variety of fields.
Intel C2D E6320 / AMD Athlon X2 3800+
Gigabyte 965P DS3 / DFI nF4 Ultra-D
2GB OCZ Gold PC2-6400 / 2GB OCZ Gold PC4000
eVGA 8800GTS 320MB / eVGA 6800GS 256MB
150GB Raptor / 74GB Raptor
2x500GB / 320GB
OCZ GameXStreme 850w / OCZ StealthXStream 600w
gaara is offline  
Old 06-27-2005, 10:45 PM   #5 (permalink)
Monster Techie
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,006

Amd started their naming scheme starting with the pIIs .
Hacp is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.