HDD Opinions - Page 3 - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > Monitors, Printers and Peripherals
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-29-2005, 03:08 AM   #21 (permalink)
True Techie
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 227


ImUseless is offline  
Old 03-29-2005, 03:47 AM   #22 (permalink)
Newb Techie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 22

I still dont know if i'll notice a different between a true SATA drive or SATA/PATA. I'm still convinced with dale's $57 WD. I don't care if I have to wait 2 seconds longer for half-life 2 to load.

Freeman420 is offline  
Old 03-29-2005, 07:00 AM   #23 (permalink)
True Techie
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 227

That WD SATA drive is the exact one I was looking at.
Its a great drive and for the $ you cant beat it. I wouldnt
think twice about buying it. Go get it.

Those numbers only mean something to those who try to
get every ounce out of their machines. I only posted those
benchmarks because of the dispute about what I said.

I became aware of the info after looking into SATA and
reading over and over again that the advertised rate was not
quite true. In fact I think it was the Barracuda drives that were
the first true SATA drive but the systems that implement the
v1 sata interface cant even push the 150 mark.

As of Tom's Hardware benchmarks, the max was somethink like
112 bandwidth interface and the WD's were only in the 70s so
less than half the advertised 150 which was all I was saying.
ImUseless is offline  
Old 03-29-2005, 07:09 AM   #24 (permalink)
Ultra Techie
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 529
Send a message via AIM to alecjahn

If you don't mind doing a mail-in-rebate:
You're the guy from that hamburger train, right?
alecjahn is offline  
Old 03-29-2005, 12:21 PM   #25 (permalink)
Monster Techie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,487

Ok I was a little confused, I thought you meant you couldn't use your drive with the SATA connectors. Because you said something about not being able to use the slimmer cables. I use the slim SATA connectors fine on mine.
And I don't know if those comparison charts really work, those are all 250GB drives, a big difference from 80GB drives.

<font size=\"1\">Intel Pentium 4 3.4GHZ HT-------------------AMD Athlon 64 3000+ Winchester
Intel Stock CPU Cooler------------------------Zalman 7700-Cu
Idle: 51C---------------------------------------Idle: 21C
Load: 72C--------------------------------------Load: 28C
ASUS P4C800-E Deluxe-----------------------GIGABYTE K8NF4-9 NForce4 4X
512MBX2 Corsair XMS 2-2-2-5 PC-3200-----512MBX2 Corsair XMS 2-2-2-5 PC-3200
ATI RADEON X800 XT Platinum Edition-------ATI RADEON X800 XL
Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS----------Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS
Western Digital Raptor 37GB 10K------------2X Western Digital SATA150 Caviar SE 80GB RAID 0
Antec True 480W------------------------------Thermaltake Silent PurePower 680W
Zalman 5.1 Headphones----------------------Zalman 5.1 Headphones
Zalman High Sensitivity Microphone----------Zalman High Sensitivity Microphone
Microsoft Multimedia Keyboard 1.0A----------Logitech Media Keyboard
Microsoft Intellimouse Explorer 4.0A---------Logitech MX510
3DMark05: 5,928------------------------------3DMark05: 5,000</font>
dale5605 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.