DDR or DDR2 - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > Monitors, Printers and Peripherals
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-08-2005, 07:55 PM   #1 (permalink)
Ultra Techie
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 862
Send a message via AIM to Megadeth2 Send a message via Yahoo to Megadeth2
Default DDR or DDR2

I'm building an Intel platform and am considering what memory to get. Should I get DDR or DDR2?

DDR is available in speeds between 200-566.
DDR2 is available between 400-667, but with bad timings.

Upgradability isn't an issue because, for future Intel processors based on 1066 FSB, I could just get DDR533 if you guys recommend standard DDR memory.

Megadeth2 is offline  
Old 01-08-2005, 07:57 PM   #2 (permalink)
Techie Beyond Description
Nubius's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,600

Well, high performance RAM such as this:


blatently come advertised as DDR400 or DDR533 with looser timings of course. They say 3-4-4-8 for DDR533 but I've seen a lot of benchmarks and reviews with it hitting that with like 2.5-3-3-8 timings. Could be something to look into, but I really don't know enough about DDR2 and the future of it quite yet.

Nubius is offline  
Old 01-08-2005, 08:00 PM   #3 (permalink)
Ultra Techie
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 862
Send a message via AIM to Megadeth2 Send a message via Yahoo to Megadeth2


I was thinking of something more on the lines of this. My main concern with this computer is cost. If I choose DDR2, then I have to get a DDR2 motherboard and a quality one like my Duramax will come at atleast $167 and then I'll need to add $125 for the cheapest DDR2.

DDR won't limit my performance and upgradability. I mean that is as long as it is still made up till DDR566. Anyone else?
Megadeth2 is offline  
Old 02-11-2005, 01:01 PM   #4 (permalink)
True Techie
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 204

Die DDR2 And PCIx!!!! DIE!!!!
ACE’s System
Athlon 64 3000+ Venice @ 2.25GHz
EpoX 9NPA+ Ultra
2x512mb Patriot XBLK
256mb BFG 7600GT
Samsung 200GB 8mb
500W Apevia (Aspire) PSU
Samsung CD-RW
Logitech Z-3 2.1
IBM 17”
Windows 2000 PRO

3DMARK05 - 6***
Ace No-Money is offline  
Old 02-11-2005, 01:11 PM   #5 (permalink)
Ultra Techie
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 821

WHy? I would think that DDR2 is better.
Regulus is offline  
Old 02-11-2005, 01:15 PM   #6 (permalink)
Elbatrop1's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,057

If you get a mobo that supports DDR2, then you'll probably eventually get better performance out of it. Although the timings are bad now, I imagine they will improve (just like DDR).

Intel E6750...........PSN: ELBATROP
XFX nForce 650i Ultra
Patriot PC2-6400 8GB (4x2GB)
eVGA 9800GT
36GB WD Raptor
120GB SG
Logitech X-530
Samsung SyncMaster 931c
Samsung SyncMaster 750s
Windows 7 Home Premium 64
Elbatrop1 is offline  
Old 02-11-2005, 02:11 PM   #7 (permalink)
Build Guru
PP Mguire's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 28,958

i agree cause ddr timings sucked when it first came out and i wanted to stay w/ my pc133! but yea im sure ddr2 will get better and then a ddr3 will come out or something w/ bad timings lol.

"Resolution is just a number." #Ubisoft
Origin/Steam = PP_Mguire Twitch = pp_mguire Instagram = ppmguire PSN = PP_Mguire

Access to my Plex PM me.
PP Mguire is online now  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.