Is this computer ok? - Page 2 - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > Monitors, Printers and Peripherals
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 07-11-2005, 01:30 AM   #11 (permalink)
Super Techie
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 462
Send a message via AIM to grego
Default

Haha, classic n00b thinking (of course, even I used to think that way). The way that the 6600GT engineered is far superior to the x700. Thus, it gets superior results, even with less ram. Often times cards with 256mb of ram can't even utilize it efficiently, as is probably the case with the x700. On one particular card, can't remember which one, the 256mb version was actually SLOWER than the 128mb version, go figure.

The actual model of video card is far more important than how much ram it has. The 6600GT will pwn the x700.
__________________

__________________
Yes, but no sprinkles. For every sprinkle i find, i shall KILL you.
grego is offline  
Old 07-11-2005, 01:31 AM   #12 (permalink)
Newb Techie
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 21
Default

So going with the slightly cheaper Gigabyte GeForce 6600GT would be superior to the x700?
__________________

ed3r is offline  
Old 07-11-2005, 01:53 AM   #13 (permalink)
Ultra Techie
 
macdawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 813
Default

6600GT is definetely superior, go look up some benchmarks showing how much faster the 6600GT is and you'll be impressed.
macdawg is offline  
Old 07-11-2005, 02:16 AM   #14 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,946
Default

It mocks even the x700 xt.....

http://www.graphics.tomshardware.com...i_x700-11.html
__________________
LIAN LI PC-7B PLUS II
OCZ MODSTREAM 520W
P4 3.2
2GB KINGSTON
EVGA 6800GS PCI-E
ASUS P5GD1
WD CAVIAR X2
LG DVD BURNER X2
vaderpro is offline  
Old 07-11-2005, 11:35 AM   #15 (permalink)
Super Techie
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 462
Send a message via AIM to grego
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by ed3r
So going with the slightly cheaper Gigabyte GeForce 6600GT would be superior to the x700?
Most definitely... get the 6600GT. If you got the x700 and then saw someone elses 6600GT you'd kick yourself (or cry, if you're the sensitive type).
__________________
Yes, but no sprinkles. For every sprinkle i find, i shall KILL you.
grego is offline  
Old 07-11-2005, 02:17 PM   #16 (permalink)
Beer
 
Calzinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 565
Send a message via AIM to Calzinger
Default

Buy a power supply.

Look into getting a Seagate Barracuda with NCQ (Native Command Queue).
__________________
Calzinger is offline  
Old 07-11-2005, 02:47 PM   #17 (permalink)
Super Techie
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 496
Default

Heyyo,

Vaderpro... you gotta choose your benchmarks better. Doom 3 is nividia optimized, which means obviously all nvidia based vidcards will tend to do better since that game's biased. Mainly in their choice of shader calculation system apparently. So yes, if I were to throw an HL2 benchmark at ya, the ati cards would come ontop.

Now, UT2k4 is somewhat nvidia optimized since they have the nivida logo on the intro, but look at the results:
http://graphics.tomshardware.com/gra...charts-04.html

as you can see, 6600gt series tends to outdo the x700 series. But only by a mere 7F/S. Not very much. So yeah, cheaper, but tends to run better on ut2k4. Nowadays, you should try n' get your vidcard around the games you play the most really. If you find yourself playing the source engine (HL2, CSS) games more than UT2k4, COD, D3, and other nvidia-optimized games, then sure, get an ATI, but if vice versa, then get nvidia... rediculous how this is now where optimizing games for companies matters more than their brute preformance.....

I won't bother with the 3DMark scores, both ati and nvidia have been caught cheating on this one several times over.

Ok, so here's the most even benchmark on tom's hardware, far cry. It's a neutral game. This is one you should measure the brute preformance by, and it does seem to read out how one should expect the cards to go:
http://graphics.tomshardware.com/gra...charts-07.html

the 6800 SLI's ontop, follow by ati's x850 XT PE. Now, this benchmark proves why I think SLI's a waste of cash for now. Paying rediculous amounts of cash for 2 vidcards, while 1 vidcard is barely trailing behind... yeah. The price/preformance ratio is definately on ati for the higher end vidcard solutions for now. Heck, check this out:

6800 U SLI: 135.2 F/S
6800 U: 102.9 F/S

That gap, for literally doubling the pricetag? They better throw in lifetime warranty, but they don't. So not worth it. Ok, so maybe games as of right now do not take full advantage of SLI.. but in the near future, do you think every game will support it? How bout 3DFX back in the day? how many games supported that?? like 5? yeah, great. I think just by luck, G.O.D. felt pitty on the people with old voodoo 2's and supported it in the Serious Sam series, maybe just for kicks, I dunno.

This's just what I think though people, it's up to you guys to decide if you think SLI will go the full distance or not... sweet jebus I went offtopic diddn't I? may the fourm admins be kind to this poor soul.

To try n' bump myself ontopic.. I say go for the 6600gt. ATI's been doing only a decent job on their PCI-e lineup, but Nvidia's been working overtime to ensure they came out with better, and they did. This definately makes up for their Geforce4 lineup. Same goes for most of the FX lineup too. It's kindof like ati n' nvidia's reversed themselves eh? on that final agp strech, ati was ontop with the 9800 pro, great card, great price. Now it's nvidia with the great card n' great price (the 6600GT). Interesting how the computer world is like, "give-or-take".. or at least I think so cause I'mma odd computer geek.
__________________
Later-A-Much, and LONG LIVE THE D!
æ ThE_MarÐ
ThE_MarD is offline  
Old 07-11-2005, 07:26 PM   #18 (permalink)
Newb Techie
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 21
Default

yep the comps been bought, 6600GT, thanks guys.
ed3r is offline  
Old 07-11-2005, 07:38 PM   #19 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,006
Default

Actually, Xbit labs has a review on the x700 compared to the 6600GT. In it, they concluded that the 6600GT is the better buy.
__________________
6600GT PCI-E for sale/Trade. Check the FS/FT forums on tech-forums for details.
http://www.techist.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=77816
Hacp is offline  
Old 07-11-2005, 11:39 PM   #20 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,946
Default

Good point mard....but don't we still come to the same conclusion????.....it performs slightly better in half life 2 ..ok, but overall the 6600gt is a much better buy.
__________________

__________________
LIAN LI PC-7B PLUS II
OCZ MODSTREAM 520W
P4 3.2
2GB KINGSTON
EVGA 6800GS PCI-E
ASUS P5GD1
WD CAVIAR X2
LG DVD BURNER X2
vaderpro is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.