The only reason people "ATi Owns!" or "nVidia Owns!" is because they have video cards from one of these companies. It is just an opinion. The only people who can really support what they say are those who have tested both cards. For example, during the previous generation, I tested a 9800XT against an FX5900 (OC also) and the 9800XT whooped the FX5900 in nearly everything. Secondly, each company has their strengths. Saying one company is better at something than the other is not worth it. Are you people really desperate to fight over an unnoticable difference graphics. I know I wouldn't. Anyways, I thought I'd post this so both ATi and nVidia fans could know what their cards are equal to or in some cases better or worse.
This does look bad for nVidia, but remember this. nVidia always has had and has a better price
erformance ratio than ATi. In other ways, you really do get a full return on your investment (this does not hold true for the FX and the 9 series). This comes straight from an ATi fan.