idiotec
Fully Optimized
- Messages
- 1,746
I know, that is why I said "where is it?"there is no lga775...
See, if it were there, I would have said "there it is!"
See the difference?
~Edit~ I am a jack ass.....
I know, that is why I said "where is it?"there is no lga775...
Panther5060 said:and its included in the package.
DJ im not talking about the straight k6, that wasnt even the equivilant to the pentium 1...
im talking about the k6-2/+/k6-3/+
those processors came out at speeds ranging from 333mhz to 550mhz when at the time intel had the pentium 2 out, which promptly got whipped. The k6-2+ even kept up with a p3 about 50mhz faster so... ya, and for under 200$ for a top of the line cpu, you can guarantee that amd got itself into the race with that cpu line.
Trotter
none of the imitations that amd made surpassed the originals
and ya, with the last three, i DEFINATLY want to see some other benchmarks supporting this too. This is more than likely too good to be true... Itd be rather amazing though dont you think... 2.0ghz p4 klowns athlon 64 fx-53 (prescotts have yet to really do that even LMAO)
dale
Microsoft is better than macintosh only because of the availability of programs on pcs, and the same lack of availability on macs. In terms of stability, security, and power, macs are probably better.
That shouldn't be a problem. I'm sure my 133mm Zalman 7700-Cu 2.1 pound heatsink won't crack or damage it at all...Panther5060 said:btw, fitting a water cooler on this couldnt be that hard, they are saying the only reason you cant use a standard socket 478 heatsink is b/c the processor is too high in the socket=too much pressure and CRACK
must you turn this into an argument?dale5605 said:And here come the AMD fans trying to make pathetic excuses. No Intels have way better memory bandwidth. I get like 5998MB/s/5997MB/s on sandra's memory bench compared to AMD scoring like 3000 each way.