amd processors speed = to intel speeds - Page 2 - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > Monitors, Printers and Peripherals
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-07-2004, 07:56 PM   #11 (permalink)
Ultra Techie
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 764
Send a message via AIM to True_Orb

However Pentiums tend to be better for overclocking.

I argue with people on internet message boards.
Don\'t copy dat floppy!

Gigabyte GA-7DX(R) DualBIOS/A-bit KV8-Pro
AMD Duron 1.313GHZ/AMD 64 3000+ 2.0 GHZ
512 DDR266/1024 OCZ DDR (3200)
Chaintech GeForce 3 128mb/eVGA 6800GT 256mb
400 watt Powmax/530 watt Fortron
40.9GB 94098U8/80gb SATA
Maxtor DiamondMax/Seagate Barricuda
AOpen KF45A modded case
True_Orb is offline  
Old 12-07-2004, 07:58 PM   #12 (permalink)
Ultra Techie
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 858

you can say that, but i think that the entire FX family, especially the 55 would disagree violently

GageMW is offline  
Old 12-07-2004, 09:38 PM   #13 (permalink)
Newb Techie
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21

thnx guys
rootbeeris is offline  
Old 12-07-2004, 09:43 PM   #14 (permalink)
Monster Techie
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,909

AMD's was actually named after the clocks of Intels, as intel's clocks are faster, being slower clocks, AMD name convention tells that say AMD 3000+ will run as equal as Intel 3.0. but in some cases its seen that AMD's matching equalivents are faster than intel's
Intel Core2Quad 2.66Ghz 12MB L2-Cache
4096MB DDR Kingston Hyper-X
GigaByte GA-P35-DS3R
XFX 9600GT AlphaDog
Seagate 2 X 320GB SATA2
LG L246WH Flatron 24"
Blind_Arrow is offline  
Old 12-08-2004, 05:10 AM   #15 (permalink)
Techie Beyond Description
Apokalipse's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 14,559

AMD CPU's have never been that great with number calculations, zipping and unzipping files into archives, or other multimedia apps, but they have been doing quite well in the gaming industry, which is what I think they were really built for.
the 3200+ may perform better than a P4 3.2GHZ in some areas, and it may be beaten in others.
all averaged up, it performs about the same
Apokalipse is offline  
Old 12-08-2004, 05:24 AM   #16 (permalink)
Ultra Techie
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 973
Send a message via Yahoo to intercodes


amd 3200+ 939 = to a intel process

amd 3000+ 939 = to a intel process

If you dont know what i am asking pplease ask
You can't benchmark two different family of processors and find out which one is better. You can do so within the same family of processors.
intercodes is offline  
Old 12-08-2004, 05:57 AM   #17 (permalink)
Monster Techie
willsko87's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,240

If you wanna know why the Intel and AMD CPU's perfomance is the same although the clock speeds are different have a look at this thread -

willsko87 is offline  
Old 12-08-2004, 02:52 PM   #18 (permalink)
Super Techie
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 250

whoa.. that link.. it was a post i posted about 4 months ago. Awesome, i never knew it was still alive. Glad people still use it

it's a coinkidink that someone posted the link to it 4 month later. It must be a sign that i should keep that link

<img src=>
geo3tech is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.