AMD fanboys: LOOK - Page 5 - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > Monitors, Printers and Peripherals
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 05-09-2005, 07:03 PM   #41 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,363
Default

Sorry for this dumb/noob question, but will the dual cores be better in multi tasking than Intel?
__________________

__________________

Quote:
Ricer: from the latin word Ricarius meaning to suck at everything you attempt.
desiboi is offline  
Old 05-09-2005, 07:28 PM   #42 (permalink)
Techie Beyond Description
 
Nubius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,600
Default

Quote:
and AMD should be in shame that they still havent got their multi-tasking issues worked out
the hell are you talking about VIII, there ARE no issues. Remember a couple weeks ago when it was posted about the Intels 'releasing dual cores first! woohoo!'

Like's been said, Intels dual cores aren't at all old, there was an article regarding them being the first to release it, and now AMD has released theirs.

It's as equal as it gets, each companies latest dual core addition and Intel lost. Obviously AMD doesn't have any multitasking issues if it's beaten out the Intel dual cores, and Intel is supposed to be KNOWN as teh multitasking CPU's, so if anything intel has the issues.

Quote:
Sorry for this dumb/noob question, but will the dual cores be better in multi tasking than Intel?
That doesn't make too much sense because both companies have dual core CPUs. As it is AMDs dual cores beat out the Intel dual cores, so yes an AMD dual core will of course effectively beat out a single core Intel
__________________

Nubius is offline  
Old 05-09-2005, 07:32 PM   #43 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,363
Default

So now we can use AMD's for multimedia?
__________________

Quote:
Ricer: from the latin word Ricarius meaning to suck at everything you attempt.
desiboi is offline  
Old 05-09-2005, 07:37 PM   #44 (permalink)
Techie Beyond Description
 
Nubius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,600
Default

Desi, use some common sense man.....if AMD Dual cores are better than Intel Dual cores, which means they are certainly better than Intel single cores which are known for multimedia then what do you think?
Nubius is offline  
Old 05-09-2005, 07:38 PM   #45 (permalink)
I Rule You
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 543
Send a message via AIM to FadingTheory Send a message via Yahoo to FadingTheory
Default

Yup. Two threads should be enough.
__________________
Iraq... whee.
FadingTheory is offline  
Old 05-09-2005, 07:41 PM   #46 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,363
Default

Silly me............
__________________

Quote:
Ricer: from the latin word Ricarius meaning to suck at everything you attempt.
desiboi is offline  
Old 05-09-2005, 08:58 PM   #47 (permalink)
Ultra Techie
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 531
Send a message via AIM to jnev_89
Default

wow... what a bunch of fanboys you all are. can't you all just accept that both cpu's are viable alternatives?? amd's are good for some things, pentium's are good for other things.

so annoying...
jnev_89 is offline  
Old 05-09-2005, 09:33 PM   #48 (permalink)
Techie Beyond Description
 
Nubius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,600
Default

Not really...if AMD's were known for gaming...and intels for multimedia and multitasking....and now the AMD's are also beating out the Intels for multitasking....it looks as though AMD's are good for everything, and intel is OBSOLETE
Nubius is offline  
Old 05-09-2005, 10:33 PM   #49 (permalink)
Build Guru
 
PP Mguire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 28,291
Default

nubius has a very good point. i would have to say hes being fanboyish toward AMD but everything he says is true to the benchies. its sad that they have to OC an intel just to freakin beat out a stock AMD lol. oh and for you fanboys (intel/ dale wannabes) you making the excuse for just saying oh well its a low end cpu you cant test that blah blah. its a load of **** (spits on the ground) cause its intels newest against AMDs newest, so its all equal agaisnt newest CPUs. plus i didnt think a pentium4 etreme was a low end chip anyways? those intels are always more exspnsive than any AMD. now, that little coment about us AMD fanboys being cheap bastards and not getting intel casue they are to much money. well my friend were not like you and have more money than brains. we live on a budget and were not a major corporation so we get whast the best for our money and im sorry but AMD is the best for any money. point closed.
__________________
"Resolution is just a number." #Ubisoft
Origin/Steam = PP_Mguire Twitch = pp_mguire Instagram = ppmguire PSN = PP_Mguire

Access to my Plex PM me.
PP Mguire is online now  
Old 05-09-2005, 10:37 PM   #50 (permalink)
Lord Techie
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,013
Send a message via AIM to DJ-CHRIS
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Nubius
Not really...if AMD's were known for gaming...and intels for multimedia and multitasking....and now the AMD's are also beating out the Intels for multitasking....it looks as though AMD's are good for everything, and intel is OBSOLETE
Yeah, but can AMD heat my house o_O
__________________

DJ-CHRIS is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.