After Pentium 4 HT - Page 4 - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > Monitors, Printers and Peripherals
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 12-22-2004, 08:25 PM   #31 (permalink)
Ultra Techie
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 862
Send a message via AIM to Megadeth2 Send a message via Yahoo to Megadeth2
Default

geo3tech, why are you comparing an FX-55 to a P4EE. A person with even half a brain knows that the L3 cache is just for marketing purpose and isn't really worth as much as it is piped up to be. That is why Intel took out the L3 cache on the Noconas. Even a P4 570J (3.8 GHz) beats out an FX-55 in non-gaming apps. Nubius has admitted that AMD is better at gaming alone. He told me that Intel was better for my purposes. Many others have said that too. So, please get your facts right.

Edit: I'm sorry about the half a brain comment. Once my mind starts, it doesn't stop. Really sorry!
__________________

Megadeth2 is offline  
Old 12-22-2004, 08:26 PM   #32 (permalink)
Master Techie
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,088
Default

Heres another Review, without the FX-55.


http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu...on64-3800.html
__________________

__________________
Finished With TF.
Codeine is offline  
Old 12-22-2004, 08:31 PM   #33 (permalink)
Ultra Techie
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 862
Send a message via AIM to Megadeth2 Send a message via Yahoo to Megadeth2
Default

Where the hell is the 570J? Where the hell is the newer 3.46 GHz P4EE which is a piece of crap? YOU PEOPLE TURN UP ANCIENT BENCHMARKS PROVING AMD THE WINNER IN EVERYTHING AND THERE IS NOT DAMN TRACE OF THE NEWER INTEL PROCESSORS ANYWHERE! My P4 520 oced to 3.73/1066 even outperforms an FX-55 in power apps. I'm speaking from experiences.
Megadeth2 is offline  
Old 12-22-2004, 08:33 PM   #34 (permalink)
Ultra Techie
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 862
Send a message via AIM to Megadeth2 Send a message via Yahoo to Megadeth2
Default

And if AMD is better, then how come a 3400+ or S-754 beats out a 3500+ on S-939 and a 3700+ on S-754 beats out an FX-53 on S-939? At least Intel doesn't have problems with overlapping performance.
Megadeth2 is offline  
Old 12-22-2004, 08:39 PM   #35 (permalink)
Ultra Techie
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 862
Send a message via AIM to Megadeth2 Send a message via Yahoo to Megadeth2
Default

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu...tium4-570.html

Here you go! I stand by my conclusion that AMD is better at gaming alone and Intel is better at everything else!
Megadeth2 is offline  
Old 12-22-2004, 08:40 PM   #36 (permalink)
Ultra Techie
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 862
Send a message via AIM to Megadeth2 Send a message via Yahoo to Megadeth2
Default

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu.../p4xe-346.html

How about this?
Megadeth2 is offline  
Old 12-22-2004, 11:50 PM   #37 (permalink)
Ultra Techie
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 584
Default

The only reason for a 64-bit processor imho is for the data-path and the fact that it can address more memory.
__________________

__________________
A+ Core Hardware, Software Certified (May 13 2005)
the new beast...

AMD Athlon XP 3200+ Barton running at 2.16 Ghz.
GeForce MX 4000 (mainly takes the load off the main system)
Creative Labs Audigy 24-bit sound.
Some Case from tigerdirect
512 MB Ultra DDR RAM.
80GB Seagate HDD
LiteOn CD-RW / DVD ROM drive.
currently looking at a litescribe drive at staples, due to its ability to label the CD shortly after being burned.
mrdinkel is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.