3D Mark score - Page 12 - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > Monitors, Printers and Peripherals
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 04-13-2005, 11:59 AM   #111 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,487
Default

It's in my sig. 5,928.
Considering the difference in price between a 3.4 p4 and an FX-55 it seems like the better option for you would have been to get a little bit weaker processor and a more powerful video card. I think the FX-55 is a little overpriced, I'm sure there isa better 'bang for your buck' AMD or something.
But I suppose it you add the card later then you will make up for it, I just would have done it originally myself. But then again like people say 3dmark is more gpu than cpu. Though it still uses cpu a lot.
__________________

__________________
<font size=\"1\">Intel Pentium 4 3.4GHZ HT-------------------AMD Athlon 64 3000+ Winchester
Intel Stock CPU Cooler------------------------Zalman 7700-Cu
Idle: 51C---------------------------------------Idle: 21C
Load: 72C--------------------------------------Load: 28C
ASUS P4C800-E Deluxe-----------------------GIGABYTE K8NF4-9 NForce4 4X
512MBX2 Corsair XMS 2-2-2-5 PC-3200-----512MBX2 Corsair XMS 2-2-2-5 PC-3200
ATI RADEON X800 XT Platinum Edition-------ATI RADEON X800 XL
Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS----------Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS
Western Digital Raptor 37GB 10K------------2X Western Digital SATA150 Caviar SE 80GB RAID 0
Antec True 480W------------------------------Thermaltake Silent PurePower 680W
Zalman 5.1 Headphones----------------------Zalman 5.1 Headphones
Zalman High Sensitivity Microphone----------Zalman High Sensitivity Microphone
Microsoft Multimedia Keyboard 1.0A----------Logitech Media Keyboard
Microsoft Intellimouse Explorer 4.0A---------Logitech MX510
3DMark05: 5,928------------------------------3DMark05: 5,000</font>
dale5605 is offline  
Old 04-13-2005, 01:26 PM   #112 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
idiotec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,748
Default

Quote:
12,398 marks lol
Not bad man!
Quote:
tried 433/1183 and it locked up and I had to restart, so I'm think 425 like you will probably be my cap until I get better cooling, but being that my card is only two days old the memory is doing good It can do 1175 thus far and after a weeks burn in should do even better......
So much for taking it easy for a while huh I know, it is tough to resist pushing them. 425 is already a pretty big OC (~22%), so that isn't bad at all. Your memory is definately doing better than mine. Last time I tried 1150 the freakin' ground was purple

Definately post back when you get the WC set up. I want to see 450!!!
__________________

__________________

BE HEARD - Techonvent
DS3 | E6400 - 3.2GHz 24/7 | 2GB OCZ PLat. PC6400 | 6800GT | Zippy 460W
What the world needs is more geniuses with humility, there are so few of us left.
idiotec is offline  
Old 04-13-2005, 03:43 PM   #113 (permalink)
Techie Beyond Description
 
Nubius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,600
Default

Quote:
It's in my sig. 5,928.
Considering the difference in price between a 3.4 p4 and an FX-55 it seems like the better option for you would have been to get a little bit weaker processor and a more powerful video card. I think the FX-55 is a little overpriced, I'm sure there isa better 'bang for your buck' AMD or something.
But I suppose it you add the card later then you will make up for it, I just would have done it originally myself. But then again like people say 3dmark is more gpu than cpu. Though it still uses cpu a lot
Aren't you gonna scream and gripe to him about how he could take the time to read your sig.......

Ton - your system is performing right on par and 3dmark01 pretty much proves that as even if I had a higher OC than your 6800 with mine, the overall score would still be like 5k less which is all your systems doing
Nubius is offline  
Old 04-13-2005, 05:37 PM   #114 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,487
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Nubius
Aren't you gonna scream and gripe to him about how he could take the time to read your sig.......
Nice
__________________
<font size=\"1\">Intel Pentium 4 3.4GHZ HT-------------------AMD Athlon 64 3000+ Winchester
Intel Stock CPU Cooler------------------------Zalman 7700-Cu
Idle: 51C---------------------------------------Idle: 21C
Load: 72C--------------------------------------Load: 28C
ASUS P4C800-E Deluxe-----------------------GIGABYTE K8NF4-9 NForce4 4X
512MBX2 Corsair XMS 2-2-2-5 PC-3200-----512MBX2 Corsair XMS 2-2-2-5 PC-3200
ATI RADEON X800 XT Platinum Edition-------ATI RADEON X800 XL
Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS----------Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS
Western Digital Raptor 37GB 10K------------2X Western Digital SATA150 Caviar SE 80GB RAID 0
Antec True 480W------------------------------Thermaltake Silent PurePower 680W
Zalman 5.1 Headphones----------------------Zalman 5.1 Headphones
Zalman High Sensitivity Microphone----------Zalman High Sensitivity Microphone
Microsoft Multimedia Keyboard 1.0A----------Logitech Media Keyboard
Microsoft Intellimouse Explorer 4.0A---------Logitech MX510
3DMark05: 5,928------------------------------3DMark05: 5,000</font>
dale5605 is offline  
Old 04-13-2005, 05:51 PM   #115 (permalink)
Techie Beyond Description
 
Nubius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,600
Default

yeah I thought you'd like that
Nubius is offline  
Old 04-13-2005, 06:02 PM   #116 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,487
Default

__________________
<font size=\"1\">Intel Pentium 4 3.4GHZ HT-------------------AMD Athlon 64 3000+ Winchester
Intel Stock CPU Cooler------------------------Zalman 7700-Cu
Idle: 51C---------------------------------------Idle: 21C
Load: 72C--------------------------------------Load: 28C
ASUS P4C800-E Deluxe-----------------------GIGABYTE K8NF4-9 NForce4 4X
512MBX2 Corsair XMS 2-2-2-5 PC-3200-----512MBX2 Corsair XMS 2-2-2-5 PC-3200
ATI RADEON X800 XT Platinum Edition-------ATI RADEON X800 XL
Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS----------Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS
Western Digital Raptor 37GB 10K------------2X Western Digital SATA150 Caviar SE 80GB RAID 0
Antec True 480W------------------------------Thermaltake Silent PurePower 680W
Zalman 5.1 Headphones----------------------Zalman 5.1 Headphones
Zalman High Sensitivity Microphone----------Zalman High Sensitivity Microphone
Microsoft Multimedia Keyboard 1.0A----------Logitech Media Keyboard
Microsoft Intellimouse Explorer 4.0A---------Logitech MX510
3DMark05: 5,928------------------------------3DMark05: 5,000</font>
dale5605 is offline  
Old 04-13-2005, 06:25 PM   #117 (permalink)
Lord Techie
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 5,280
Send a message via AIM to beedubaya
Default

3dMark03 - 12,011
3dmark05 - 5173
Aquamark 3 - 63,336

Not too bad, i say.
beedubaya is offline  
Old 04-13-2005, 07:05 PM   #118 (permalink)
Techie Beyond Description
 
Nubius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,600
Default

Yup highest aquamark I got was 58,888 but that's another overall system based benchmark. That extra 5k ya got is mainly memory bandwidth.
Nubius is offline  
Old 04-13-2005, 07:24 PM   #119 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,446
Send a message via AIM to Alex81388
Default

3dMark05 barely touches the CPU, so you can't even compare.

I underclocked my FX to 2.0 ghz and lost 50 points on 05...what does that say???

Also Futuremark is known to favor ATI cards, so don't even start with that 'should have gotten an XT PE' crap.
__________________
Sig removed due to foul language. Please read the rules regarding the allowable content of sigs before reposting your COMPLIANT sig.
~Trotter
4/21/06
Alex81388 is offline  
Old 04-13-2005, 07:26 PM   #120 (permalink)
Techie Beyond Description
 
Nubius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,600
Default

Quote:
Also Futuremark is known to favor ATI cards, so don't even start with that 'should have gotten an XT PE' crap.
Theres a big discussion about that at xtremesys....futuremark HEAVILY favors ATI....basically sucking money out of their pockets.

ATI approved drivers for ORB are really up to date whereas nvidias are like from december.....futuremark is ridiculously biased
__________________

Nubius is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.