3D Mark score - Page 11 - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > Monitors, Printers and Peripherals
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 04-13-2005, 12:40 AM   #101 (permalink)
Techie Beyond Description
 
Nubius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,600
Default

Don't know I haven't run it myself yet haha..I'll post back in a few
__________________

Nubius is offline  
Old 04-13-2005, 12:57 AM   #102 (permalink)
Ultra Techie
 
TonCrafter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 879
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Nubius
Don't know I haven't run it myself yet haha..I'll post back in a few
I'll be here with bells on. I wann see what you get. Otherwise, I have no way to compare mine.
__________________

TonCrafter is offline  
Old 04-13-2005, 01:05 AM   #103 (permalink)
Techie Beyond Description
 
Nubius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,600
Default

Aright, mind you this is at stock 6800GT settings, which got me 4.800 in 3dmark05, and when OC'd to Ultra speeds got close to yours at 5,410 so I'll actually wind up OC'ing mine up to Ultra speeds to see how big the gap is then.

Anywho for a little system recap for ya

35w 2400+ XP-M @ 2.6GHz
1gb PC3200
6800GT Stock speeds

3dmark01 - 18,949

As you can see yours is considerably higher, but I'll have to see how much making mine at Ultra makes, then based off that we'll know how much is pure system difference I'll be making another post
Nubius is offline  
Old 04-13-2005, 01:17 AM   #104 (permalink)
Wizard Techie
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,220
Default

hmm nubius, like u said, that xp-m is somewhat bottlenecking you (and by a lot since it's 01, which is tests a lot more cpu than 05)

i got 18508 with my setup @210fsb 1:1 and 6600gt @ 550/1100, but still, a pretty good score nontheless considering you're on an xp-m
__________________


Quote:
I don\'t play for fun, I play to win and winning is fun.
diabloII is offline  
Old 04-13-2005, 01:22 AM   #105 (permalink)
Techie Beyond Description
 
Nubius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,600
Default

Aright, ultra speeds, exactly 400/1100 and I got

DUN DUN DUN

19,247

So as you can see Ton, that FX plays a serious role when using a program that actually tests the whole system and not just the card like 05 and 03

Diablo - yeah it's not so much the CPU that's bottlenecking it really as it is the fact that the AMD64's have an awesome memory controller. If you did a sandra memory bench I bet you'd get 5.9 or 6gb/sec transfer whereas I'd get 3, so thats play a siginifant role.

If you did a sandra arithmatic and multimedia bench for the CPU, I'm willing to be my XP-M wouldn't be too far from yours

So like I said it's mainly memory, but yeah...in due time I will slowly make the move to AMD64, but since it's all hot right now, my core hit 87C on the GPU, so I gotta wait until water cooling before I really OC it.
Nubius is offline  
Old 04-13-2005, 04:19 AM   #106 (permalink)
Techie Beyond Description
 
Nubius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,600
Default

Aright idiotec :glares: haha

I'm running 416/1175 right now...I had tried like 430/1190 but it didn't want to do it, but at the previously mentioned speeds it wasn't artifacting at all and I got 5625 in 3dmark05.....running 3dmark03 and before I actually submit this post I'll wait for it to finish and let ya know what I get

::waiting::


....::still waiting ::

yes I'm still waiting quit asking!


Ooooh last sound test the end is coming!!

Aaaaaaaand we got 3dmark03 score.....ladies and gentlemen....I give you:

12,398 marks lol

Nowhere near the 13K mark.....don't think I'll be able to even get close to that without water cooling and possibly a voltage boost lol.

Your ram bandwidth just destroys mine I'd probably have to do like 500/1300 to beat ya

EDIT: lol couldn't resist, had to push it more

tried 433/1183 and it locked up and I had to restart, so I'm think 425 like you will probably be my cap until I get better cooling, but being that my card is only two days old the memory is doing good It can do 1175 thus far and after a weeks burn in should do even better......
Nubius is offline  
Old 04-13-2005, 07:13 AM   #107 (permalink)
Ultra Techie
 
TonCrafter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 879
Default

Thanks for sharing your scores Nubius. I'm serious when I say that I'm NEW to this benchmarking stuff. So, don't think I'm trying to show off or anything. I just want to make sure that I got as good a comp as I payed for.

Overall verdict is that my machine is performing well..............correct?
__________________
Abit IP35 Pro
Core 2 Duo 2.2ghz
eVGA GTX460 1GB
2gig Crucial Ballistix Ram
PC Power & Cooling 510
------------------------------------------
2.33ghz Core 2 Duo Macbook Pro
TonCrafter is offline  
Old 04-13-2005, 07:19 AM   #108 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,487
Default

An x850 xt or x800 xt probably would have got you another 1,000 points or so. Because except for the video card your system is better than mine lol. I mean FX-55 compared to 3.4 p4 and I still whipped your score.
__________________
<font size=\"1\">Intel Pentium 4 3.4GHZ HT-------------------AMD Athlon 64 3000+ Winchester
Intel Stock CPU Cooler------------------------Zalman 7700-Cu
Idle: 51C---------------------------------------Idle: 21C
Load: 72C--------------------------------------Load: 28C
ASUS P4C800-E Deluxe-----------------------GIGABYTE K8NF4-9 NForce4 4X
512MBX2 Corsair XMS 2-2-2-5 PC-3200-----512MBX2 Corsair XMS 2-2-2-5 PC-3200
ATI RADEON X800 XT Platinum Edition-------ATI RADEON X800 XL
Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS----------Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS
Western Digital Raptor 37GB 10K------------2X Western Digital SATA150 Caviar SE 80GB RAID 0
Antec True 480W------------------------------Thermaltake Silent PurePower 680W
Zalman 5.1 Headphones----------------------Zalman 5.1 Headphones
Zalman High Sensitivity Microphone----------Zalman High Sensitivity Microphone
Microsoft Multimedia Keyboard 1.0A----------Logitech Media Keyboard
Microsoft Intellimouse Explorer 4.0A---------Logitech MX510
3DMark05: 5,928------------------------------3DMark05: 5,000</font>
dale5605 is offline  
Old 04-13-2005, 07:23 AM   #109 (permalink)
Ultra Techie
 
TonCrafter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 879
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by dale5605
An x850 xt or x800 xt probably would have got you another 1,000 points or so. Because except for the video card your system is better than mine lol. I mean FX-55 compared to 3.4 p4 and I still whipped your score.
I considered getting an ATI card again, but I decided on Nvidia because of SLI. I plan to get a second Ultra here soon. What score did you get?
TonCrafter is offline  
Old 04-13-2005, 09:39 AM   #110 (permalink)
Super Techie
 
Lasrix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 363
Default

its all in my sig but here:

3DMark01 – 14,019
3DMark05 – 3262
3DMark03 – 7936 OCED-531/1031 -- 8193
AquaMark3 – 47,166

i have yet to test them all on OC.

__________________

__________________
<img src=\"http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y137/Lasrix/fags.jpg\" >
Lasrix is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.