Formatting and block size - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > Hardware Repairs and Troubleshooting
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-28-2009, 06:00 PM   #1 (permalink)
Super Techie
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 303
Default Formatting and block size

When in the partition wizard for windows, it asks me about the block size I wish to make it. I've heard there are advantages to making the block size 64k especially for video.

My question is, can someone explain a little the advantages/disadvatages to large or small block sizes? Is there some reading I can do on this subject? I googled this topic, but found little help anywhere, hence my post here.

Any advice would be appreciated.


eipeks is offline  
Old 03-29-2009, 10:05 AM   #2 (permalink)
True Techie
dude112's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 236
Default Re: Formatting and block size

"I haven't installed Vista, but I believe the "block size" it is talking about is the NTFS cluster size. XP used 4096-byte cluster sizes by default on drives >2GB.

Cluster size is essentially the size of each "fragment" that makes up a file. Whenever you write a file to disk, the OS breaks it up into multiple clusters and writes these individually. Any remaining part of the file which is smaller than a whole cluster takes the whole cluster anyway. The clusters which belong to a file are tracked in the master file table (MFT).

Small cluster sizes reduce "slack" (wasted space at the end of non-full clusters), but tend to have worse file performance since each small cluster needs to be fetched from disk individually. Furthermore, small cluster sizes increase the severity of fragmentation since each file has the potential to be broken into more fragments. Large cluster sizes tend to waste more space but perform better and be less impacted by fragmentation. Clusters larger than 4096 bytes may cause some disk utilities (such as Windows' built-in defragmenter) problems however.

Cluster size ideally would depend on the typical file size stored on the partition. If a partition primarily holds files smaller than 1KB then a 4096-byte cluster would be needlessly wasting space. Likewise, if a partition primarily contains large videos then a 4096-byte cluster would be needlessly harming IO.

As c627627 said, going for the default option will usually be best. It shouldn't make clusters so large that disk utilities have problems, nor clusters overly-small for the size of the partition being formatted (since larger partitions tend to hold larger files).


Source Which Block Size When Formatting? - Overclockers Forums
Case: Fractal Design R4 \ PSU: Corsair TX-650 V2\ Mobo: Asrock Z75 Pro 3
Processor: Intel i5 3570K Stock
RAM: Corsair Vengeance 8GB 1600C9 (2x 4GB) \ Videocard: Gigabyte 7950 Windforce 3
SSD: Samsung 830 \ HDD: Samsung SpinPoint F1 500GB \ DVD-RW: 1x LG
Speakers: Logitech (2.1)\ Monitor: Dell Ultrasharp U2312HM
Keyboard: MS Comfort Curve\ Mouse: Logitech MX 518
dude112 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bad Block Svoloch Hardware Repairs and Troubleshooting 0 03-01-2008 03:27 PM

Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.