Your opinions on this computer? - Page 2 - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > New Systems | Building and Buying
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-10-2006, 10:44 PM   #11 (permalink)
True Techie
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 155

to JBones, "Well, my understanding is that problems crop up for a small minority of users with almost all but the best models, even now that the industry is starting to warm up. So, I'll go over those bad reviews in detail, but again, my thinking is that it's the people with problems who submit reviews-- not the people for whom it's clear sailing. "

i completly agree with you, i used to think like that too, but think about it, they don't do it just for this model. happens for all models, and this one happens to have less that 5 eggs, which i miself would trust to spend over $100+ on. And also, good reviews come from those that are impressed. So overall, they balance out.

I don't have one of these, but a buddy of mine is gettin it. and this one has 285 reviews, averaging out 5stars/5. I say it's still the better buy for the price.

but i didn't know you're willing to go that high, so yea, ignore this, but ignore the hyundai, too. get a xerox or something, the brightness on those pretty much blind you on first sight.

umybiatch2k6 is offline  
Old 05-11-2006, 03:23 PM   #12 (permalink)
Super Techie
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 430
Send a message via AIM to tehdigit

if you are happy with your current monitor screw a new one.

if you get a new one go with a cheap crt 21"

like half the price and they are better then most LCDs right now

Nothing to It
Sponsored by Subway, Steel Series, XFire, Xsessive Hosting

tehdigit is offline  
Old 05-11-2006, 05:36 PM   #13 (permalink)
Junior Techie
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 75

Uh, the 21"+ CRT monitors I've seen cost upwards of $350. And they weigh 60 pounds.

Not to mention a 21" CRT is only about 19" viewable.

No, I don't have any complaints regarding my current 17" BenQ, but bigger is better.
Jonathan Bones is offline  
Old 05-11-2006, 05:52 PM   #14 (permalink)
Monster Techie
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,499

i wouldnt say that was all that great a deal either. for a start the cpu wont last u more than a year if ur wanting to play games that use dual core like UT2007. so then that would b like $1200 including the added cpu. i think it would b better to just build ur own.
Mentali$T is offline  
Old 05-11-2006, 06:45 PM   #15 (permalink)
Junior Techie
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 75

Here's how I see it:

To just begin building a brand new system...

CPU: 3700+ (San Diego)
MOBO: Asus A8N-E
GPU: EVGA Geforce 7900GT
RAM: 1GB "decent brand"

Including tax, that would cost me about $950 USD. That's from a decent local retailer-- as a Canadian, I don't have access to Newegg.

I could use the soundcard I have. But I'd still need a HD, DVD-RW drive, case, PSU, and OS. Good-but-nothing-special parts, that adds at least another $350 USD, taxes included.

So, for a savings of $400, I'm getting a system with an only slightly slower CPU and GPU. Plus, I'm getting a couple of good games gratis.

And if I want to upgrade the CPU a year or more down the road, I imagine I'll be able to get a decent deal on a 4400+ or 4800+ or something once AM2 has come out.
Jonathan Bones is offline  
Old 05-11-2006, 07:09 PM   #16 (permalink)
Ultra Techie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 566
Send a message via AIM to reckliss

if you want it get it
reckliss is offline  
Old 05-11-2006, 07:41 PM   #17 (permalink)
Junior Techie
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 75

Well, my point in posting is eliciting opinions. I'm not going to buy a computer on impulse.
Jonathan Bones is offline  
Old 05-11-2006, 07:52 PM   #18 (permalink)
Ultra Techie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 566
Send a message via AIM to reckliss

Microsoft Windows XP

Any Case

FSP Group 450 Watt PSU

MSI K8N Neo4-F


$159 (AR)

G.Skill 2x1GB

SeaGate Barracuda 80GB

Use existing Optical

Thats $859.49 so thats just a idea of a build
reckliss is offline  
Old 05-11-2006, 08:03 PM   #19 (permalink)
Monster Techie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,306
Send a message via AIM to Brtnboarder495

Okay, the 7800GT is slower than the 7900GT, and more expensive. Also, you can't even find a 7800GT anywhere anymore.

The only thing about the 7900GT is that it'll be easily bottlenecked by your Athlon 64 3200+, so either do some heavy OCing on that 3200+ or go with the 7600GT (slower, but also nearly half as much and still solid).

I'd really go for the 7900GT, Opteron 144, DFI Nforce 4 Ultra-D, and some OCZ or G.Skill PC4000 2x512mb memory though. The Opteron basically is a slightly slower 3200+ with doubled the L2 cache (better), and has much better OCing potential. OCZ and G.Skill work great with DFI, and the PC4000 memory will give you more room to work with when OCing.

Brtnboarder495 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities

Copyright 2002-2015 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.