I would have to say that due to poor development kits, the 360 as of right now if more powerful then a ps3. This was proved with madden 2007. The game plays at 60fps on a 360 and only 30 on a ps3. Its extremely hard to code for a ps3 right now, so its easier for developers to optimize for the 360. The situation sort of reminds me of the 2900xt driver problems right now, and how there not optimized yet.
On a side note, what do you mean by a computer has higher resolutions? The 360 and ps3 display at 1080P... Can your monitor do that? Cause most of ours can't.
Originally Posted by nylax4
You are retarded if you think you can compare a PC/360/PS3 on teraflops. Those tech sepcs are just a lot of technical mumbo jumbo that 99% of people on this forum including me don't know how to analyze.
Cores and teraflops mean nothing because a computer's processor has completely different uses compared to the Xbox 360 and PS3. Even then it just depends on how developers utilize all the hardware.
You are very right on that note. Game consoles cannot be compared because they are so extremely optimized for games. The hardware is made for a single purpose and the system doesn't have to run things like windows and all its junk in the background.